Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums

Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums (http://www.videokarma.org/index.php)
-   Television Broadcast Theory (http://www.videokarma.org/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   TV set interference issues, in BBC land... (http://www.videokarma.org/showthread.php?t=273273)

Chip Chester 09-22-2020 08:54 PM

TV set interference issues, in BBC land...
 
Here's a BBC story regarding TV-set-generated interference taking revenge on the new wireless upstart.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-54239180

MIPS 09-24-2020 07:42 PM

You can swing that two ways:

-Older electronics are electrically less clean than modern electronics when it comes to (presumably) forcing noise back upstream on the AC line or EMI shielding.

-Modern electronics (and supposedly telecommunication equipment) are so cost reduced that they cannot handle abnormal line or environmental conditions.

Electronic M 09-24-2020 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIPS (Post 3227760)
You can swing that two ways:

-Older electronics are electrically less clean than modern electronics when it comes to (presumably) forcing noise back upstream on the AC line or EMI shielding.

-Modern electronics (and supposedly telecommunication equipment) are so cost reduced that they cannot handle abnormal line or environmental conditions.

I tend to disagree with the first statement from all the noisy switch mode supplies in modern gear.... but then again "old TV" in the vernacular these days includes switch mode supply sets 70s and newer.

old_tv_nut 09-24-2020 09:59 PM

This story was incomplete. The whole village is served by DSL, which is much more susceptible to interference than a broadband coax cable system.
Here's a more complete version:
https://arstechnica.com/information-...for-18-months/

user181 09-25-2020 05:56 AM

TV set interference issues, in BBC land...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by old_tv_nut (Post 3227768)
This story was incomplete. The whole village is served by DSL, which is much more susceptible to interference than a broadband coax cable system.
Here's a more complete version:
https://arstechnica.com/information-...for-18-months/


That still isn't "the rest of the story." It's a crap explanation to say that DSL is more susceptible to interference. That mere fact alone doesn't mean anything.

For starters we need to understand if it was conducted or radiated noise. Also, for all we know there might be some other intermediate object that was indirectly responsible for a perceived cause-and-effect relationship.

As an aside, Ars Technica is as good of a source for accurate technical information as People Magazine is for hard-hitting investigative journalism.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.