Quote:
Originally Posted by old_tv_nut
|
That still isn't "the rest of the story." It's a crap explanation to say that DSL is more susceptible to interference. That mere fact alone doesn't mean anything.
For starters we need to understand if it was conducted or radiated noise. Also, for all we know there might be some other intermediate object that was indirectly responsible for a perceived cause-and-effect relationship.
As an aside, Ars Technica is as good of a source for accurate technical information as People Magazine is for hard-hitting investigative journalism.