View Single Post
  #78  
Old 08-25-2016, 03:47 PM
Electronic M's Avatar
Electronic M Electronic M is offline
M is for Memory
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pewaukee/Delafield Wi
Posts: 14,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by miniman82 View Post
The problem is not the literature for the chassis, it's the specification itself. Not only did they choose an anode supply for the 5 chassis which only provides around 20kv to the CRT, they also for some unknown reason decided to not make up for that lack of voltage by having ample current reserves. To understand why this is a detriment, see note 3 of this PDF on the 21AXP22:

https://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/137/2/21AXP22.pdf )

I say lack of voltage because the 5 is the only one that low, all other chassis (especially the earlier ones) made a full 25kv and had more than enough current in the anode supply to make a full and bright picture without trying very hard. Add this to the fact that the data sheet on the CRT even tells the engineers that less anode voltage equals less brightness, and it will always be a mystery to me why RCA chose in this one particular chassis to do what they did. I don't care to speculate why it happened, it's an issue and makes the 5 a real dog in the brightness department compared to other sets.
Add to that the fact that some chassis versions have a bass-ackwards brightness/contrast control circuit that has lots of interaction between controls, and some users were literally sending working sets to the repair shop because they could not manage to set the controls for a good watchable picture.

The 5s are the BOTB RCA color chassis in my book. If I had a nice 5 with a good 21AXP as well as my beat up 4 with a bad AXP I'd consider the 4 more worthy of the rare AXP.
__________________
Tom C.

Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off!
What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4
Reply With Quote