View Single Post
  #5  
Old 07-30-2012, 09:02 PM
Rinehart Rinehart is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 129
But even if politicians and the FCC wanted to establish political and social controls on television broadcasting, why did it have to take this particular form? For example, why would it be necessary to have both the audio and the video carrier in the same frequency range, with all the potential problems with beat frequencies? Why not have the video carriers in one part of the broadcast spectrum, and the audio carriers in another? True, the viewer would have to tune them separately, which is maybe a little more effort, but it would remove the need to have a standard for the distance they would have to be separated.
__________________
One Ruthie At A Time
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma