Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early B&W and Projection TV

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 05-23-2012, 04:57 PM
DaveWM DaveWM is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 5,607
one more thing, if the lin pot has been hacked up, make sure the cathode bypass cap (100uf electro) is NOT being cut of of the circuit when the lin pot is turned to min, esp since that 950 fixed resistor is in there. Worst case you have a 950 unbypassed cathode resistor with the lin pot turned in such a way as to take the cap completely out of the circuit. IIRC there is something different between how the schmatic is drawn and how the lin pot and cap are actually done, but I may just be remembering that wrong. If it was me I would for grins just put a 500 ohm fixed resistor and the cap in there and see how that works (disconnecting the hacked up lin pot/resistor combo), as is sure seem like its a gain issue on that tube, assuming of course the grid bias and drive are correct.

Last edited by DaveWM; 05-23-2012 at 05:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 05-23-2012, 05:57 PM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
With the 6DR7 removed, I measure about 0V on pin 3. (It starts out higher when the set is cold and then sinks to zero, never going negative.) I will slide out the chassis and inspect that voltage divider.

Phil Nelson
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 05-23-2012, 09:51 PM
Don Lindsly Don Lindsly is offline
Ex-Philco
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 450
If there is high voltage, then there is -45 volts on the 6DQ6 grid. That goes through the 470K-560K divider to lug 21, looped to lug 40 to the 1.5 meg bias resistor and the .22 uf bias filter. If all those components are good, then the .1 coupling cap or .22 uf bias filter is leaky or the tube is very gassy.

The 100 ohm isolation resistor is not critical as long as it is somewhere in range.

All this assumes there are no wiring errors. I am using the Philco service notes for things that do not show on the attached Sams print so some component designations may not match.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:37 AM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
Thanks, we may be getting somewhere. I traced the negative voltage from the 6DQ6 grid, along the path you described, and it all looks reasonable until I get to the junction of the 100-ohm resistor and pin 3, so possibly something is funky there -- a bad solder joint, cracked trace, or bad socket . . . . I'll investigate tomorrow when I'm feeling fresher.

I recently got the Philco service manual, which is better than Sams in some ways. For instance, it has a wonderful diagram of the main circuit board, with a list of what all of the perimeter connecting wires are connected to -- something I had laboriously drawn by hand in the past.

I scanned the Philco schematic (in two parts) in case anyone might find that helpful:

http://antiqueradio.org/art/Philco10L4xSchematic1.jpg
http://antiqueradio.org/art/Philco10L4xSchematic2.jpg

An advantage of using the Philco docs is that the part numbers (and other IDs) match those printed on the circuit board.

Regards,

Phil Nelson
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 05-25-2012, 01:36 AM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
I checked the voltage divider components, 6DR7 socket, and relevant connections. All seem fine. While looking at some other voltages, the height started to bounce irregularly, and eventually I realized that the 6DR7 tube (a new one!) was failing in front of my eyes.

With a fresh 6DR7 in place, I'm getting some bias voltage on pin 3, although still weak, only about -7 volts. Currently, I have -43V on the 6DG6 grid (pin 5), -17V at the junction of divider resistors R58/R59, and -7 volts on pin 3 of the 6DR7. The picture is very nice apart from the height problem, only with a very slight bright foldover at top or bottom depending on how you adjust vertical hold, but that doesn't seem remarkable considering how compressed it is.

I temporarily bridged different resistors across the 1.5-meg (R57) to see what would happen with greater bias on the 6DR7 pin 3. Even when that voltage increased to around -17V, there was no significant change in height or the operation of the height and v lin controls.

I disconnected the vertical linearity pot for rechecking and it measures nearly 800 ohms max and operates smoothly. The schematic calls for a 1.5K pot (disregarding stops). I got rid of the old series resistor and installed a 750-ohm/2W resistor, making its total resistance close to 1.5K. It doesn't have a stop, but I'll just avoid turning it all the way to minimum, and meanwhile it should operate within the needed range.

My 1077B Analyst does provide a vertical grid drive signal, so tomorrow I can try wa2ise's suggestion about lifting C42 and injecting the signal there.

I contacted Moyers and they have the vertical output transformer in stock if I need one.

Phil Nelson
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #51  
Old 05-25-2012, 12:31 PM
Don Lindsly Don Lindsly is offline
Ex-Philco
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 450
Phil:

With the 6DR7 removed, nothing should load the bias at pin 3 assuming you're using a high impedance meter. It could be dirt on the PC or a leaky cap.

That is probably not the cause, but it should be fixed eventually.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-25-2012, 02:31 PM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
I clipped the lead between C42 and C40 and injected the 1077B's vertical grid drive signal to C42. With the 1077B Amplitude control set about midway, the height is the same as always. Cranking up Amplitude farther distorts the picture but doesn't noticeably increase the height.

Maybe it's time to order a new vertical out transformer and see if that changes anything.

Regards,

Phil Nelson
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 05-25-2012, 05:21 PM
DaveWM DaveWM is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 5,607
I am still leaning toward a problem with the vert lin and 100uf cap area.

I would try a 500ohm resistor bypassed with a 100uf cap in place of the whole pot/resistor/cap.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 05-25-2012, 09:42 PM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
I tried bypassing that pot with resistors of various sizes, and finally just shorting out the pot/resistor combination. Shorting it all out increased the height, but not enough to fill the screen. Bridging in an additional 100uf cap had no effect on any of those combinations.

Phil Nelson

Last edited by Phil Nelson; 05-26-2012 at 01:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-27-2012, 08:26 PM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
In the interest of thoroughness, I disconnected C3C (the 100uf vert lin pot cap) and C3A (10uf, connected to height control) and checked 'em. Both are good, correct values, not wired backwards.

I left C3C disconnected and wired a fixed resistor and new 100uf electrolytic in place of the old vert lin pot/cap combination. Here's the best height I can get:



Changing the resistor's value affects the height somewhat, with smaller values giving more height. Never more than seen in the photo, however.

The Height potentiometer (R7B) tests in the range of about a few K min to 2.7 megohms maximum (3 meg is specified). I tried bridging some resistors in parallel with it, just out of curiosity. I can get the height to decrease by lowering the resistance, but not increase. That pot would be an ordeal to remove for replacement or further testing. It's part of a two-pot control soldered directly to the board with eight lugs.

Phil Nelson

Last edited by Phil Nelson; 05-27-2012 at 08:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #56  
Old 05-27-2012, 10:11 PM
Don Lindsly Don Lindsly is offline
Ex-Philco
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 450
Fold over at the pix bottom indicates over drive. Back off until the fold over disappears, then measure the 6DR7 grid for proper wave form amplitude. If OK, then the output transformer and yoke are all that are left.

I measured the VOT primary on a working test chassis using three different meters. They all indicate 415 ohms within a few ohms. That is no guarantee yours is good.

You can temporarily clip yoke lugs Y5 and Y6 together to eliminate the thermistor.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 05-28-2012, 01:35 AM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
Here's a waveform from pin 3 of the 6DR7.



I didn't see any vertical foldover when that was taken. The height control was fully CW, giving maximum height.

A while back I measured resistance of the vertical yoke windings from the plug. Sams says each winding should measure 18 ohms and the thermistor 4 ohms cold. I measured 18 ohms between pins 10-11, and 25.2 ohms between pins 9-10 which includes the thermistor. So my thermistor measures 7.2 ohms cold, I guess. No idea what it measures when hot, but at least it doesn't look shorted or open.

I see lugs Y-5 and Y-6 on the Philco schematic. I assume you pull the yoke to get access to them.

Phil Nelson
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 05-28-2012, 08:36 AM
DaveWM DaveWM is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 5,607
cant tell the PP from that scope pic. can you check the cathode current on the vert out, per sams 30ma.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 05-28-2012, 12:32 PM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
I replaced the most recent scope pic with one that's easier to read. Refresh this page in your browser to make sure it shows up. The vertical volts/cm control is set to 5 volts/cm and the horizontal sweep time/cm control is set to 2 ms. The probe is at 1x.

I got out my HP 428B milliammeter to measure the current on the cathode (pin 9). Looks like about 38-39 ma. (The meter's set to 100 ma scale and the needle points to about .38-.39.)



I also tried measuring the old fashioned way by bridging a .1 mfd cap on the cathode connection and putting my probes across the cap leads. With my old Triplett analog meter, the reading looked like 36-38 ma, in the same ballpark.

If I interpret any of this correctly, it seems that cranking the Height control all the way up sends both the grid voltage and the cathode current too high, yet I'm still not getting full vertical deflection.

While doing all this, a couple of times I heard a distinct snap from the yoke area. Maybe it's time to remove the yoke and look at that thermistor.

Phil Nelson

Last edited by Phil Nelson; 05-28-2012 at 12:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 05-29-2012, 08:05 AM
DaveWM DaveWM is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 5,607
if I read that right then the PP is only 30v on pin 3 sams shows 140v. Unless I am just reading it wrong, is the 5v for each square or each division inside each square in which case it 150v

so now you need to scope pin 6, should be 140v pp same shape.

Last edited by DaveWM; 05-29-2012 at 08:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.