Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Solid State CRT Televisions

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2014, 07:30 PM
rca2000's Avatar
rca2000 rca2000 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: cincinnati,ohio
Posts: 2,090
Grabbed this a bit ago...

After missing out on that E0-1 Sylvania combo..I found a "consolation prize" a BLOCK from my bank on Galbraith road. A 1987 model NAP set.

Now--a few weeks or so ago--we were all talking about the mid-1980's NAP sets, the "C" chassis models. Specifically--the ones I am aware of...C1, C2, C3, C5 C6 C7 C8 and C9. The first 4 chassis are HOT and have a fly that did NOT hold up all that well. I will NOT pick up ANY of them. Not sure if I remember a "C4" chassis or not. The "C3' was a 19 inch set--also hot--that succeeded the E32 chassis, IIRC. They are shit too...IMHO.

The C6 was the first "cold" one, but I THINK it still had that "shitty" flyback--and had a VERY bad drawback as far as the power supply goes. The feedback ckt for the SMPS, also had it's B+ line fed to the audio amps. If one of them shorted--it would also kill the B+ to the feedback opto-and THEN--the SMPS would sun away--and go into overvloltage shutdown!! The chassis DID look impressive, with fairly large sinks on dual audio amp chips--BUT they were NOT very powerful, and the flys were not real reliable--as in the C5 sets.

Then there was the C7. It was a 13 and 19 incher, and LOOKED to be a cold chassis--but is NOT. it has an SMPS_-but still a hot chassis. But as reliability goes--not too bad. I worked on a lot of them 20 or more years back.

The "C8" chassis was different. It had a different, more reliable flyback (although I DO recall a couple actually "exploding" in FRONT of me, maybe 20 or so years ago--then splitting in half..) and a simpler layout. It DOES have a rather different cold SMPS supply. It uses one transformer--BUT it is run in 2 modes--the normal "run" mode AND a low-tide "standby" mode--wherein it produces a MUCH lower output, IIRC. There are a pair of transistors that drive a darlington SMPS out transistor, and if they get even a BIT leaky or such...it WILL INSTANTLY blow that little SMPS out transistor !! I worked on a LOT of--and fixed a lot of these sets--in the early 1990's. I have not seen one in a while though. I somewhat like them. They are not in the same class as out "favorites" like the Chromacolor sets--but for a relatively modern set (1987 model)...not exactly "junk" either.

The C9 was the final C series chassis, IIRC, and it looked just like the C8-BUT had FULL digital controls for all functions, and nearly NO analog type controls, IIRC. After this came the G1, which also had full digital controls and a much simplified layout--with NO daughter modules IIRC. Then the H series and the P series--all pretty much like the G chassis, but with an SMPS for standby, instead of a line tranny as in the G1--and different vertical ckt. ANY of those sets, G, P and H and the sucessors, R and Z chassis, I worked on many of these, they are pretty easy to fix, and had fairly good tubes in them.

So anyway...I am heading to the bank....and spot a console tv on the curb. I expected it to be an RCA CTC-130 or 149 or such--they seem to STILL be very prevelant---and I am NOT much interested in them. But as I drove by it--I noticed it said "Magnavox" on it. I thougth it might be a C5 or C1 set--NEITHER of which I wanted. I pulled into the center lane--and jumped out of the car for a quick "look see". I was unable to find a chassis #--but it was mag. in Dec. 1986, and had AV in/out. So, I figured it was either a C5 or C6. After a bit of hesitation--I decided to go and get the van--and grab it. Had it been a C-1 o0r C5 or such-_I would simply sit is BACK out in the garbage, likely whole, this coming week.


I made it back in the van, about 30 mins. later, and tossed it in the van. I then took it to the mall, where my sister was, and took a quick look at the innards. I expected a C-6...but was greeted by a C-8 chassis. Cold chassis, nice layout.


SO--this will likely be a "keeper". As modern sets go--not too bad. NO metal in the chassis, other than sinks. Certainly not like an "old classic"...but typically for a late 1980's set. The tubes were not too bad in these, IIRC, and the cabinet is not bad--a bit of bubbling on top(probably was rained on), but not bad, and looks clean inside. I will put it in the garage, and the 21FJP22 sitting on the floor(sitting on a piece of foam), will likely go on top of this set.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 0627141622.jpg (122.4 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg 0627141622a.jpg (88.3 KB, 44 views)
File Type: jpg 0627141625.jpg (87.1 KB, 63 views)

Last edited by rca2000; 06-30-2014 at 04:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2014, 09:51 PM
TVTim's Avatar
TVTim TVTim is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 578
Very nice catch!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-28-2014, 10:36 AM
Jon A.'s Avatar
Jon A. Jon A. is offline
Don't mess with Esther.
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,267
Nice! The front of it makes it look like the Maggie I decided not to buy recently, but this one has a much nicer looking, not to mention cleaner cabinet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-29-2014, 02:02 PM
zenith2134's Avatar
zenith2134 zenith2134 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,539
Cool set .
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2014, 04:02 PM
zeno's Avatar
zeno zeno is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4,710
Hey what you got against the C-1 A.K.A. two board Maggie ?
I loved them & think they are the best from Magnavox.
I agree on the C-3, biggets crap can I can think of.
A great example of engineers run amok & causing havoc to
any tech that tried to understand them. Now your C-8 was
a nice set & it will serve you well.

73 Zeno
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 06-30-2014, 04:30 PM
rca2000's Avatar
rca2000 rca2000 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: cincinnati,ohio
Posts: 2,090
Just never liked them...or ANY of the early C series sets. Besides the fact that they are hot chassis, the flybacks did NOT hold up too well in any of the C1-C6 sets. The C6 was cold--but had the same style fly as the older C series, IIRC.

A LOT of the problems I saw on the C-1 and C2 sets...besides Star module problems--was a dead set. They had a start-up transformer that ONLY produced a quick pulse, IIRC and a diode off of it often shorted---causing no start. Along with a good deal of flyback problems....but not NEAR as bad as the C-5 or E32,/34 and E51/53 sets--that went through flybacks like a ZR-1corvette goes through gas !!

I DO agree they did produce a nice pix--when working though. Along with somewhat easy to work on--compared to the C-3 and C-5ets.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2014, 10:05 AM
holmesuser01's Avatar
holmesuser01 holmesuser01 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 1,731
I saw several of the 19C4 chassis... The ones I saw were among the first stereo sets. The chassis looked like the C1's with the split chassis.
__________________
Bruce
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.