Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Television Broadcast Theory

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2021, 12:50 PM
TVBeeGee TVBeeGee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 59
I have something to add to this thread. Primetime episodics from that era were usually shot and also post produced on 35mm film. 35mm optical sound has MUCH higher frequency response than the 16mm optical sound you may have heard at your local TV station, or in a classroom. 35mm running speed is nearly three times faster than 16mm, roughly 90 feet per minute, versus only 33 feet per minute for 16mm. Faster media makes reproduction of high frequencies easier. But, that's not all.

Sound post was done using 35mm mag film media, which is audio-only film with a magnetic audio coating mostly across its full width and no photosensitive emulsion. It has sprocket holes along each edge just like 35mm photographic film and also runs at 90 feet per minute. That's 18 inches per second, folks.

Mag film fidelity was incredible for the era, due to wide tracks, higher mass, fast speed, and a very stiff base compared to audio tape. Track skew and wow and flutter were all amazingly low due to mass and dimensional stability.

Mag film was typically used throughout the post process, including the final mix. The visual editing produced a silent "picture master." The audio post produced an "audio-only mag track master." Both final elements were then used to create any 35mm release prints with optical sound that might be needed for network play.

The 35mm optical soundtracks provided to the networks were very good, theatrical in quality, much better than network distribution could support in that era, but sound from the magnetic film is even better.

In most cases, the production studios kept the separate picture and sound masters and those are often used as the sources for what you see and hear today.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2021, 06:23 AM
TVBeeGee TVBeeGee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 59
Two reasons:

1. In NYC and LA, the two largest television markets in the USA by far, primetime audio quality was always vastly superior to what was heard elsewhere. Viewers in those markets enjoyed very high quality audio because the local stations in those cities were often in the same buildings as their respective East and West Coast network operations centers. Short hops to their local transmitters, often via microwave, kept the audio quality quite high compared to what the rest of the country was getting from AT&T Long Lines.

2. Business decisions. Since the days of I Love Lucy, producers have struggled with cost versus future proofing. Some are acutely aware that they can earn as much or more from reruns as first runs, so they invest in the future of the product by using technology and production methods that go far beyond what television can faithfully render at the current time. Others are primarily interested in a quick return, or believe their product doesn't have the future "legs" to justify the investment, or simply can't afford anything better.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.