|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
And in the end it's the eyes of the beholder
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
HDTV was designed to be viewed at about 3.5 times picture height, confirmed by viewing tests with untrained subjects. Farther away you lose some benefit of the resolution, closer there is no more detail to be gained.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Based on that, of course, then UHD/4K, with twice the resolution in both directions relative to 1920x1080 HDTV, will be ideal at 1.75 times the picture height, assuming that everything works in a linear way. I am probably sitting about two times the picture height away from my 77-inch-diagonal screen, so that is pretty close to ideal I think. And, yes, I can easily see the difference among 4K, 1080i/p, and 720p at this position.
__________________
Chris Quote from another forum: "(Antique TV collecting) always seemed to me to be a fringe hobby that only weirdos did." |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I have a Sony KD-34XBR960 which displays nice HD images. It is no match to my 2018 LG OLED with 4K, HDR, DOLBY VISION/ATMOS capability.
A small apartment has a 12 foot wide wall, plenty of room to add a projector screen or large flat screen OLED panel less than an inch thick. I would argue that a CRT television takes up more room, especially a KD-34XBR960. You want eye panning in your home to get the immersive feel you get when watching a movie in a commercial theater. That what a home theater is all about.
__________________
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
FYI: DigiBeta presentation.
|
Audiokarma |
|
|