Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early B&W and Projection TV

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 03-04-2017, 12:57 PM
decojoe67's Avatar
decojoe67 decojoe67 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,322
I think what's more important is the first production television set. There where many CRT television prototypes done in the early part of '30's. I have a picture in one of my books of Vladimir Zworykin standing next to an RCA credenza style mirror-in-the-lid CRT television set from 1929! It likely was nothing more than an interesting looking piece of furniture at that time, although the man was getting there quickly!

Last edited by decojoe67; 03-04-2017 at 01:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-04-2017, 01:50 PM
tubesrule's Avatar
tubesrule tubesrule is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by decojoe67 View Post
I think what's more important is the first production television set. There where many CRT television prototypes done in the early part of '30's. I have a picture in one of my books of Vladimir Zworykin standing next to an RCA credenza style mirror-in-the-lid CRT television set from 1929! It likely was nothing more than an interesting looking piece of furniture at that time, although the man was getting there quickly!
While the 1931 RCA receiver was not a set the public could buy, it was internally called the "Pre-Commercial Television Receiver" and was done to evaluate the quality, operation and cost of ownership of a fully electronic picture/sound receiver. This was not some lab prototype or test mule but was a fully packaged, fully functioning television receiver we would recognize today that was placed into the homes of RCA engineers/officers. All costs of manufacturing, ease of use and technical aspects were recorded to evaluate the feasibility of full production. I know of no other full television receiver of this era that was readied for production, let alone one that made it out of the lab. While it turned out to be a wise move to wait for the release of commercial television, there is no reason these units, as is, could not have been sold to the public.

Von Ardenne's test of 1930 were of a closed circuit film scanner and monitor which was not a full transmitter/receiver and not new for the time. Others had done these test back to at least 1929. Your picture of Zworykin and his 1929 picture receiver in the Radial 47 cabinet shows the state of the art. That 1929 picture receiver was operated and described in the December 1929 issue of Radio Engineering so it was more than just a piece of furniture.
__________________
Converters for obsolete standards:
www.tech-retro.com

Last edited by tubesrule; 03-04-2017 at 02:36 PM. Reason: Fixed typo on Radiola cabinet
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-04-2017, 02:18 PM
decojoe67's Avatar
decojoe67 decojoe67 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubesrule View Post
..... Your picture of Zworykin and his 1929 picture receiver in the Radial 48 cabinet shows the state of the art. That 1929 picture receiver was operated and described in the December 1929 issue of Radio Engineering so it was more than just a piece of furniture.
Interesting! Thanks for the info. It would've been so great if that 1929 proto. would've survived. What a beautiful TV it was. Someone very skilled could actually recreate one if they could find a nice 1929 Radiola 47!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-04-2017, 02:58 PM
peter scott's Avatar
peter scott peter scott is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 81
The development of receivers was interesting but the real initiator of viable television was the electronic camera incorporating charge storage and for that we have to wait for Zworykin along with Ballard's interlacing in 1934.

See: http://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk/Emitron.htm

Peter

Last edited by peter scott; 03-05-2017 at 02:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-04-2017, 06:10 PM
tubesrule's Avatar
tubesrule tubesrule is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 321
True Peter. Without that piece of the puzzle television would have to wait.

Darryl
__________________
Converters for obsolete standards:
www.tech-retro.com
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #21  
Old 03-06-2017, 11:35 PM
damien191's Avatar
damien191 damien191 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Roper View Post
That article is chock full of inaccuracies. The set appears to be a Marconi 702, which was not one of the original dual-standard sets of 1936. The article gives the impression that there was a ten year gap in British TV service due to the Crystal Palace fire, which is a bizarre and absurd retelling of history. "Logie Baird and Marconi had separate companies but used the same people to make the sets, but Marconi became the most popular maker." Um, what? The auctioneer also claimed the TV set was a result of British radar technology from WW2. Hop in your DeLorean and figure that one out....
there was a small gap in British TV during WW II? they halted television broadcasts at the time for some reason or another - the crystal palace transmitter was more than likely the only one that reached his home in the 30's

"Britain: Television transmission was suspended on the day that war was declared against Germany. The Alexandra Palace transmitter was retuned and used to jam German aircraft navigation frequencies, and television manufacturing facilities were converted to make radio and radar equipment. Apparently, toward the end of the war, transmissions were resumed from Alexandra Palace in preparation for full scale production." earlytelevision.org

"ts analogue channels were BBC One and BBC Two (styled BBC 1 and BBC 2 until 1997). The BBC first began a television service, initially serving London only, in 1936. BBC Television was closed during World War II but reopened in 1946." wikipedia

Mr Davis bought the Marconi type–702 set on November 26 1936 / WWII Sep 1, 1939 – Sep 2, 1945 - its reasonable to assume that as rare as tv's were they would not have been concerned with rebuilding the tower when there was a war looming even then

Last edited by damien191; 03-06-2017 at 11:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-07-2017, 12:55 AM
ppppenguin's Avatar
ppppenguin ppppenguin is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 448
Need to correct a few misconceptions in the last post.

TV started in London on 2nd November 1936 from Alexandra Palace. The first regular high definition service in the world.

It closed down at the outbreak of WW2 (Septemeber 1939) for 3 main reasons. One was that it was a luxury that couldn't be afforded during wartime. Another was the fear the transmissions could act as beacon to guide enemy aircraft. The third was that the skilled engineers and technicians were needed for work on radar.

The Alexandra Palace transmitter was used during WW2 to counter the "Y" beam navigation system used by the Luftwaffe. There are also persistent stories of the studios being used late in the war for TV demonstrations. Exactly what happened is still unclear.

After WW2 the service was restarted in time for the victory parade in 1946. This used exactly the same equipment as before WW2. Much maintenance was needed but no rebuilding of the studios or tower at Ally Pally.

Transmission was moved from Ally Pally to Crystal Palace in 1956. Studios remained at Ally Pally.

The 1936 fire at Crystal Palace destroyed the Baird company's laboratories there. The BBC TV transmissions were not affected.

BBC2 started in 1964 on 625 lines, UHF with transmissions from Crystal Palace. At that point the original BBC TV service became known as BBC1.

The 702 was one of the original sets released in 1936 for the start of the TV service.

The relationship between TV and radar in the the UK is interesting. A lot of technology was common to both. There is no truth in the often repeated suggestion that the UK government deliberately encouraged the development of TV in order to provide a good basis for radar. However in the UK we were fortunate to have developed CRTs, VHF techniques etc before WW2. TV also gave us a pool of skilled engineers and factories capable of making radar equipment. Radar IF was 45MHz (same as BBC TV vision) for many years, due to the good performance of a TRF TV receiver made by Pye which used the then new EF50 valves.
__________________
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-07-2017, 02:37 PM
damien191's Avatar
damien191 damien191 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 19
thanks - there were bits i couldn't find in the quick googling i did looking for facts, but i wanted to give some insight from the little i did know

now i know more... soon i shall know even more slightly!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.