|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Here's what inspired this thread.....
I just rescued this 1946-47 Kelvinator electric range from the metal scrappers. I thought it seemed like a pretty well made piece: My wife saw it, and said, yes, it's very well made, but look at the design of it. There are only 3 burners, and they are VERY close together. There's a ton of wasted space too.....it's got no broiler, and the oven is on the right hand side instead of under the burners, the rest is just storage. And, with the oven on the RIGHT, whatever you sit on the big space to the right of the burners is going to be subjected to the heat of the oven. Why wouldn't they have put the oven UNDER the burners, and made that whole space one large cabinet if they wanted to, or put two burners on each side as to make more cooking space? That would leave room for a broiler, too. She's pretty smart, that one . But I'm still keeping the stove
__________________
"Restoring a tube TV is like going to war. A color one is like a land war in Asia." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I see it has that removeable pot, for cooking soups, etc. That was a big selling point, at the time. Feature not available on a gas range. Whoever owned the range, took really good care of it. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Years ago, my parents had a range that looked like that. On the model that they had there was a fourth burner in the bottom of the "crockpot" well. The position of the burner was adjustable so that it could be positioned on the top of the range if more "surface cooking" area was desired. Most of the time it was left in the lowest position, as Mom usually made a big pot of soup once a week...YUM! jr |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Its usable space for pots,etc |
|
|