Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Television Broadcast Gear

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-08-2012, 12:40 AM
Rinehart Rinehart is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 129
Image artifacts in early TV

I found these photos on Steve Restelli's web site historytv.net. They are from Vladimir Zworykin's personal collection of pictures taken of early television broadcasts. There are about sixteen or so in total, most of them show the characteristic faults of iconoscope cameras: edge flaring, shading problems, etc. But these also show curved lines radiating from the edge to the centre. Mr. Restelli tells me that they are on the original photographs, although scanning has accentuated them. He doesn't know what caused them. I've looked through the section on image defects in Fink, but they don't look like any of the examples there. Can anyone hazard a guess at what they might be?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1934 Baseball and Football-1.jpg (28.4 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpg 1934 Baseball and Football-2.jpg (23.5 KB, 35 views)
File Type: jpg 1935 Mickey Mouse-1.jpg (28.9 KB, 40 views)
__________________
One Ruthie At A Time
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2012, 08:00 PM
compu_85's Avatar
compu_85 compu_85 is offline
Procrastination Expert
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 281
I would venture those are not visible when viewing the set directly. Cameras never seem to be as good as the eye in this regard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2012, 08:20 PM
Eric H's Avatar
Eric H Eric H is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: So. Calif
Posts: 11,565
I can see that effect happening with a digital camera because they use Pixels all lined up in rows, but a Film Camera shouldn't do this I don't think.
It might show the blanking interval but the Moire pattern is odd.

Maybe they used some type of polarized Filter on the camera.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2012, 04:09 PM
Rinehart Rinehart is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 129
Would the exposure time have anything to do with it?
__________________
One Ruthie At A Time
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:03 PM
Einar72's Avatar
Einar72 Einar72 is offline
Chasin roundies since '79
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Federal Way, Washington
Posts: 936
I wonder if this is deterioration of the negatives...
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:21 PM
old_tv_nut's Avatar
old_tv_nut old_tv_nut is offline
See yourself on Color TV!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rancho Sahuarita
Posts: 7,193
Please post links to these particular images so we can download them directly instead of the small ones you have posted. There are so many listed at that site that it's hard to find these in particular.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:28 PM
old_tv_nut's Avatar
old_tv_nut old_tv_nut is offline
See yourself on Color TV!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rancho Sahuarita
Posts: 7,193
Well, I found some of them (item #5).

1) the pictures on that site are tiny
2) it looks like they were scanned with totally inadequate resolution
3) this would explain the color moire between the scanner pixels and the scan lines that would be visible in the original pictures. In fact, the way they are two screen images one above the other, I wonder if they were negatives scanned at only a couple of hundred dpi (should be more like 2400 dpi for negatives or similar size positives)

Any way, this effect is NOT in the originals, but in the SCAN of the originals. The fact that the moire is in colors reinforces this conclusion.

[Edit] I wonder if Steve Ristelli would be open to having someone with a decent scanner rescan these? If the problem is not being able to post large images, someone (me for instance) might be willing to post full-resolution scans to Flickr or some other site that can carry them. If you are in contact with him, why don't you ask if he is willing to accept some help improving the posted images.

Last edited by old_tv_nut; 08-12-2012 at 10:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2012, 09:38 AM
Rinehart Rinehart is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 129
I got a note from Steve Restelli last night, and he has informed me that he no longer has the photographs. As I understand it he sold them, and other things in his collection, because he plans to retire in the near future. He did, however, reiterate that the ripple distortions were present in the original photographs, although they were more pronounced in the scanned images.
__________________
One Ruthie At A Time
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.