Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Flat Panels & Digital Format

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2013, 09:57 PM
compucat's Avatar
compucat compucat is offline
1949 Motorola 9VT1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 970
Why no more small screen FP Sets?

My wife was looking for a replacement for her Toshiba 15" flat screen TV which has always had bad reception and was more a source of frustration than anything. She uses it in the bedroom so was wanting to replace with a 15" or even a 10" set. All I could find were 19" on up or 7" portables none of which appear to be of any quality. I ended up getting an Insignia 19" set for $99 which seems to work well and seems reasonably well built despite that fact that it is all plastic. What I wonder is why there are no more small sets that are just right for kitchen or bedroom use. Years ago the 10, 12 and 13 inch sets were perfect for these applications. I figure it must be either of a couple of reasons. One, the trend toward insanely large sets means no one wants anything below 24 inches anymore. Two, small screen viewing has migrated to laptops, tablets and smartphones. Has the market died out for compact tabletop TVs?
__________________
Just look at those channels whiz on by. - Fred Sanford
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2013, 10:56 PM
radiotvnut's Avatar
radiotvnut radiotvnut is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 6,018
I think you probably hit the nail on the head. I remember when a 25" TV was a big set; but, now, if you tell someone you have a 25" TV, they ask how you can watch such a small set.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2013, 08:26 AM
compucat's Avatar
compucat compucat is offline
1949 Motorola 9VT1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by radiotvnut View Post
I think you probably hit the nail on the head. I remember when a 25" TV was a big set; but, now, if you tell someone you have a 25" TV, they ask how you can watch such a small set.
Even with our 46" plasma set, I still consider 25" to be big screen. Even my 21" Zenith roundie looks big to me. Of course, when I was a kid in the Seventies, big screen was anything 19 inches or larger. I know screen size was for a long time limited by the practical dimensions of a CRT. Today with LCDs there are few limitations on possible screen size and it shows with sets I have recently seen in stores above 70 inches.
__________________
Just look at those channels whiz on by. - Fred Sanford
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:03 PM
Electronic M's Avatar
Electronic M Electronic M is offline
M is for Memory
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pewaukee/Delafield Wi
Posts: 14,808
The smaller panels are made for laptops and tablets so IMHO they probably only make the smaller screen sets when there happen to be more panels laying around than the computer makers can use.
__________________
Tom C.

Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off!
What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2013, 05:40 PM
compucat's Avatar
compucat compucat is offline
1949 Motorola 9VT1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 970
I use my 13" MacBook Pro with a USB TV tuner as a portable TV and it works great, better in fact than any of the current portable digital sets around. Technology has come a long way.
__________________
Just look at those channels whiz on by. - Fred Sanford
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 12-08-2013, 07:27 PM
lnx64's Avatar
lnx64 lnx64 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Port Richey, FL
Posts: 1,787
I generally use my laptop too, have an eyeTV tuner.

But I do have a portable DTV. It's hard to get good reception on it with a single pole antenna though.. At least it's an f-type and can be replaced.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.n...70907393_o.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2013, 07:59 PM
Chip Chester Chip Chester is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 760
CVS has a 15" Craig set. Looks fine for a hundred bucks or so. Full inputs, reasonably high resolution. Viewing angle is very narrow, however.

Note that many smaller "portable" TVs, 7" and 9" versions, have a vertical resolution of only 234 lines (!), which I classify as truly HD: Horrible Definition. Text graphics and decoded captions are compromised.

Chip
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2013, 09:36 PM
compucat's Avatar
compucat compucat is offline
1949 Motorola 9VT1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by lnx64 View Post
I generally use my laptop too, have an eyeTV tuner.

But I do have a portable DTV. It's hard to get good reception on it with a single pole antenna though.. At least it's an f-type and can be replaced.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.n...70907393_o.jpg
The eyeTV tuner is what I use. Reception is excellent with a 6 inch monopole aerial.
__________________
Just look at those channels whiz on by. - Fred Sanford
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2013, 03:22 AM
ChrisW6ATV's Avatar
ChrisW6ATV ChrisW6ATV is offline
Another CT-100 lives!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hayward, Cal. USA
Posts: 3,472
I think that once sets of a given size get "too cheap", they stop making them, the same as hard disk drives and USB memory modules. Your 19-inch set for $100 is a good example-they are not going to bother offering 15-inch sets for $79, I suspect. (I did find one for $69 at Fry's a while back though, and I had to try a $69 HDTV, so now I keep it in the bedroom for occasional use.)

For what it is worth, all of the 19-inch LCD sets I have seen have had much better off-angle viewing than any of the 15-inch sets that were on the market at the same time, especially from above or below the screen level.
__________________
Chris

Quote from another forum: "(Antique TV collecting) always seemed to me to be a fringe hobby that only weirdos did."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2013, 06:09 AM
CoogarXR's Avatar
CoogarXR CoogarXR is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 641
You could always pick up a 15" LCD computer monitor off craigslist for about $15 and use a VGA tuner (they can be found for about $35).
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #11  
Old 12-11-2013, 06:56 AM
compucat's Avatar
compucat compucat is offline
1949 Motorola 9VT1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoogarXR View Post
You could always pick up a 15" LCD computer monitor off craigslist for about $15 and use a VGA tuner (they can be found for about $35).
One might end up with a much better and more serviceable small screen TV that way.
__________________
Just look at those channels whiz on by. - Fred Sanford
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-15-2013, 05:36 PM
Dave A's Avatar
Dave A Dave A is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,529
Small sets suffer from profit margin. Regardless of size they still need all the innards that a large screen needs. The under-the-hood cost is similar other than power for a larger screen but the margin is down to nill.

I bought a Target Element 19" a week ago for $99. It could be the worst flat ever made. It would not scan HD channels and the analog input gave the worst resolution and color I have ever seen. Gone and I hope Target chokes on the returns.
__________________
“Once you eliminate the impossible...whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." Sherlock Holmes.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.