|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
B&K 350 vs Sencore CR133 which to keep?
Over time 2 spare CRT testers have snuck in to my collection. B&K 350 and a Sencore CR133 I'm thinking of getting rid of one, but which is better?
The B&K predates color TV and probably is an attomic blast rejuvenateor model...Which may not be bad for last ditch efforts on CRTs that rejuves from gentler testers have failed on. Is the rejuvenateor on the CR133 one of the better regarded ones, or is being newer it's only advantage?
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Keep the B&K and send the CR133 to me.
__________________
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." -Carl Sagan |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
One vote for keeping the CR133.
A big enough bribe could sway this here inpartial owner.
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I have a 133 in my CRT tester collection, but it's in pretty crappy condition. Adapters are either broken or at large. Daily drivers are a B&K 467 and Sencore CR70.
__________________
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." -Carl Sagan |
|
|