Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early Color Television

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-23-2012, 01:32 AM
Penthode's Avatar
Penthode Penthode is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kitchener/Waterloo Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_tv_nut View Post
The CTC5 super chassis can fairly be described as a collection of failed experiments in cost reduction, IMO. Video, sync, chroma, and audio all have minimal performance.
I can understand your disappointment with the Super chassis. My set currently has relatively poor vertical sync and poor luma resolution despite changing all the paper caps and IF/RF realignment.

I was was somewhat taken back that there is no 4.5MHz trap in the luma path, unlike the CTC7 onwards. Certainly the CTC4 and CTC5 were evolutionary designs in cost cutting. I have yet to sweep the video amplifier and shall be looking for drifted resistors and bad peaking coils.

I have noticed however that the Deluxe CTC5 has two Snd. IF traps instead of the one on later chassis'. A 4.5MHz trap is in the chroma path only. Perhaps it was felt that the two Snd. IF traps were sufficient with a narrow video amplifier response?

I have compared CTC5 with the CTC7 thru CTC10 video amplifiers and they are suprisingly similar. I recall the CTC10 I once had delivered a sharp picture. But that was within the context of thirty years ago and my memory may be faulty as I am exposed to HD displays today. But I can say that a direct comparison of the CTC5 picture on my 1949 Black and White RCA with a 16AP4, the old 1949 set delivers a nice crisp picture and the CTC5 can't compare.

I am suspicious of the encapsulated coating on the peaking coils and of drifted resistors. I have noticed that the 180uH peaking coil feeding the grid if the video output in the CTC5 has an 8.2 kohm resistor shunt whereas the CTC10 has the same 180uH peaking coil at the video output grid with a shunt of 39 kohm.

I shall make some minor modifications to the video amplifier and shall perform some sweep measurements to see if I can improve the high frequency response a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-23-2012, 12:50 PM
teevee's Avatar
teevee teevee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 103
Perhaps these notes ref the CTC12 will also apply... (From a Jack Darr book)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg rca1.jpg (32.0 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg rca2.jpg (23.1 KB, 41 views)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-23-2012, 05:18 PM
NewVista's Avatar
NewVista NewVista is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Milw, WI
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penthode View Post

I have compared CTC5 with the CTC7 thru CTC10 video amplifiers and they are suprisingly similar.
Of course it could be accomplished with 1/3 the parts like they did at Admiral
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-23-2012, 09:42 PM
David Roper's Avatar
David Roper David Roper is offline
console lover
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,986
But did you notice that one version of that chassis drives a four-speaker sound system with a 6L6? Must be the huge Patrician model, the one that resembles a stereo combo. Sorry for the hijack, but are any of those known to exist?
__________________
tvontheporch.com
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-24-2012, 07:14 AM
NewVista's Avatar
NewVista NewVista is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Milw, WI
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Roper View Post
a four-speaker sound system with a 6L6?
Their audio is nice design also: simple bass+treble controls + neat feedback Presence control
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #21  
Old 12-25-2012, 08:02 PM
Penthode's Avatar
Penthode Penthode is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kitchener/Waterloo Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by teevee View Post
Perhaps these notes ref the CTC12 will also apply... (From a Jack Darr book)
This is very interesting. The RCA Service folk recognized the same problem? And then suggested tilting the IF to boost the higher baseband video frequencies!

Hmmm...I am going to see if the problem in the video amplifier can be minimized...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.