|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I had no idea CBS would have attempted to use a B&W TK11 for NTSC color!
It is does appear feasible however. And the CBS method would eliminate convergence problems. My guess how it worked was like this: The only modification would to speed up the disc to 6 x 29.97Hz (NTSC picture rate). This means the CBS camera color field rate would be raised from 144 f/s (6 x 24) to 179.82 f/s (6 x 29.97). The transfer tubes are simply primitive rescaling converters. I suspect the picture resolution was not as good as a TK40, but the solution would at least have likely made Bill Paley less angry with Peter Goldmark. Funny I saw Wayne's excellent descriptive posting only after I guessed the process. The article said 180 color frames per second nominal but the actual NTSC rate would be 179.82 color frames per second. Last edited by Penthode; 01-06-2017 at 09:46 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Actually, the scheme with one monochrome CRT and three storage tubes would have the same registration problems as a 3-tube camera, and the later scheme with 3 CRTs could be twice as bad. In my opinion, the Chromacoder was a "tour de farce" as bad as RCA's experiments with high-speed linear video tape.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Yes my mistake. I confused the "transfer tubes" with simple photoelectric pickup devices. Of course the transfer tubes are creating the final 525 rasters which have to be registered.
|
|
|