Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early Color Television

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-16-2004, 04:41 AM
ceebee23's Avatar
ceebee23 ceebee23 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 356
size is everything....

did RCA ...or anyone else ....design roundies bigger than 21"? and when rectangular tubes arrived did it take them long to get sizes bigger...23" ...25"?
__________________
____________________________
........RGBRGBRGB ...colour my world
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-16-2004, 05:41 AM
jstout66 jstout66 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ne
Posts: 1,484
I think 25" was the standard for quite awhile.(in a CRT set) Sony had a special 30" console that was pricey and made in limited numbers in 1980 IIRC. Sony also had a 26" model available. My parents had a 26" Sony for years and I think the manufacture date was 1979. I don't think RCA or Zenith did anything bigger than a 25" CRT until the mid 80's.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-16-2004, 05:42 AM
jstout66 jstout66 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ne
Posts: 1,484
also there was no bigger "roundie" color tube than the 21FJP22
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-16-2004, 06:32 AM
Chad Hauris's Avatar
Chad Hauris Chad Hauris is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Texas
Posts: 2,085
Can you imagine if they made a 30" round color tube (like the size of the b/w tube in the Du Mont Royal Sovereign)...do you think the technology of the 60's would have allowed such a tube to be made?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2004, 01:36 AM
Steve D.'s Avatar
Steve D. Steve D. is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hollywood Hills, Ca.
Posts: 1,790
They probably could have produced a 30" round color tube. But why? 21" roundies of the period were bulky and heavy enough. Can you imagine a 30" round color set? Just to create the proper deflection, the length of the tube and hence the size of the cabinet would take over the room. That and the shadow mask and glass envelope along with a huge high voltage section ect. would weigh a ton. Not to mention the convergence problems. A rectangular tube design was the only logical and practical solution at the time. This provided a decent size screen and a better aspect ratio.
__________________
Please visit my CT-100, CTC-5, vintage color tv site:
http://www.wtv-zone.com/Stevetek/

Last edited by Steve D.; 09-17-2004 at 01:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 09-18-2004, 10:10 AM
andy andy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,004
---

Last edited by andy; 12-08-2021 at 04:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2004, 06:17 PM
ceebee23's Avatar
ceebee23 ceebee23 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 356
of course the bigger the picture has got the more apparent the need for higher definition.

here in the PAL world the 625 line resolution means better sharper images than NTSC ...it is especially apparent with sport when they use long lenses.

this of course does not include the quality of colour that tends to be also superior to NTSC ....(side by side comparison is easy since most PAL sets handle NTSC....and of course despite the lower field rate, most of us cannot detect flicker.

on a 21" set the difference is not very noticeable but on 30" set it most definitely is....
__________________
____________________________
........RGBRGBRGB ...colour my world
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.