Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > International Vintage Televisions

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-08-2014, 02:36 AM
ppppenguin's Avatar
ppppenguin ppppenguin is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewVista View Post
Actually NTSC wider - 1.3m vs 1 m

With regards to monitoring in PAL-S...
Come to think of it, some monitors had PAL-S & PAL-D switch for convenient signal evaluation (clever).
I think you are sadly misinformed. The IBA Technical Review Volume 2 (a reliable reference) specifies 1.3MHz (-3dB) point for PAL chroma. In System I countries the upper sideband is fully present on transmissions too. In System B/G countries it's a bit marginal.

SMPTE 170M(1993) gives more or less the same figures as for PAL but the USB isn't transmittable in a standard M channel. 170M notes the earlier NTSC standard where Q is 2dB down at 0.4MHz. A lot of NTSC coding has been done with narrowband 600kHz U/V axes rather than the complication of I/Q. This is discussed in SMPTE EG27. I would attach a copy but it's SMPTE copyright. Here's a quote from EG27:

Quote:
The NTSC encoder described in ANSI/SMPTE
170M uses equal-bandwidth color-difference signals
(either B--Y and R--Y or I and Q). This removes the
need for a delay line in the color-difference signal. A
shorter delay line than required for NTSC 1953 is used
in the luminance (Y) signal (see figure 4).
When this signal is transmitted, a low-pass filter in the
transmitter bandwidth limits the luminance (Y) signal
and the upper sidebands of the color-difference sig-
nals (either B--Y and R--Y or I and Q) to 4.2 MHz.
Transmission of equal-bandwidth color-difference sig-
nals to the receiver has the effect of limiting the
recoverable chroma bandwidth to 0.6 MHz as a result
of the truncation of the upper sidebands of the chroma
modulation in the transmitter’s 4.2 MHz filter. This is
considered acceptable since there are no modern
receivers that utilize the theoretically possible wide-
band I demodulation made possible by maintaining
__________________
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.