|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
This impedance matching issue can harm more with basically-VHF signals from eg. 1600*1000 @ 85Hz or more for analog RGB monitors; this requires a lot of bandwidht, making mismatch readily visible. I have a Dell P991 (Sony chassis) operating at 1600x1200 (at 75Hz), and even a little loss of conduction from VGA connector makes ghosting.
__________________
So many projects, so little time... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Maybe it's an impedence issue and the cable itself won't help? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Poor quality cables can cause significant problems with high resolution analogue monitors, even if the terminations are good. At 1600x1200 it's very hard to make analogue interconnection look as sharp and good as DVI or HDMI.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm mostly concerned with whether or not the BNC inputs will give me better quality and less reflections at higher resolutions than the VGA cable does, given a similar quality of cable. At the time (like late 90s/ early 2000s), I remember people telling me that it's not worth it and I'd never tell the difference, but Sony seems to claim the BNCs are better when using the monitor at it's limits. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I doubt it will make much difference if you use the BNCs but you never know. Analogue video bandwidth of around 60MHz over co-ax was never easy. Everything has to be right, from the graphics card (not always as good it should be) though the cables and monitor itself.
|
Audiokarma |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
So many projects, so little time... |
|
|