![]() |
Quote:
I rather not risk it. |
Agree it's best to error on the safe side. However my gut feeling is you'd be hard pressed to heat up an area of a CRT through conduction of it's dag coating, considering the typical resistance of the material and it's low thermal mass. Might be a fun youtube experiment. :)
|
Quote:
If you put your finger in the middle of a 20KV arc and you are not connected to either supply pole you will feel more pain from the plasma burn than the shock (as I know first hand). |
I got the recoated CRT installed without any troubles :)
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1444/...a741ca33_z.jpg I believe this chassis was originally designed for round CRTs because of a couple clues. One - This tube bumps into the CRT and there's no room to install a shield. https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1594/...0c6d4e93_z.jpg Two - The discriminator coil is mounted under the chassis. That gave me a headache while doing the alignment as the instructions for adjusting the top and bottom slugs are the opposite of what I needed to do. Sound is excellent now :) https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1501/...7e4551be_z.jpg I then fought with the ion trap magnet and centering rings to eliminate corner shadows and minimize distortion. Still not entirely happy, but it's not very noticeable while viewing programming. https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1510/...f925632e_z.jpg So that's a wrap for the chassis restoration. Next up I'll arrange for a trip to reunite it with it's cabinet. https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1544/...01bb1688_z.jpg |
Quote:
|
Another restoration that looks awesome! What's next on the restoration bench? Possibly a porthole or a remote set?
|
Nope. A Stromberg Carlson 21 inch tabletop I'm restoring for a client. I'll be starting a new thread soon.
|
Excellent restoration, Bob. I'm surprised they didn't recess that tube socket 1/4" or so below the chassis.
|
Yeah that would have been a simple solution. Perhaps I could drill out the rivets and recess it :scratch2:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The other example I gave of a poor arcing ground strap connection was a surface arc too and that surface arc DID cause an implosion. |
I noticed the aquadag coating on the CRT bell was flaking off (there is a large bare spot where the coating should be, even though most of the rest of the dag is still on the tube). I'd replace the tube, as it could be very weak--especially if the TV was made in the 1950s and was used a lot by its former owner(s). There could be high-voltage issues as well if the dag coating (or any part thereof) is missing, including arcing or even no raster. Because the dag is one part of a large HV capacitor in all CRT TVs, it is very important that the coating is intact over the entire surface of the tube bell.
Edit: I just looked at some other posts in this thread and found that Bob had recoated the CRT bell, thereby restoring the tube to normal, or at least as close to normal as one can come with a 1950s-era CRT. I was not aware (until just now) that flaking aquadag could be replaced, but I learned something tonight when I saw the references to Slip-Plate and the other compound mentioned. BTW, the picture on the newly-recoated CRT looks good from here. Bob said there were still some issues with the image the tube produces, but from what I can see, the picture is pretty darn good. I would think defects in the raster, etc. would show up more prominently on a crosshatch pattern than on a standard program picture anyway. |
Quote:
I had read somewhere that Warwick aquired Pacific Mercury sometime in the 50's. They were building the Thomas organ there as well. :scratch2: |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.