Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums

Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums (http://www.videokarma.org/index.php)
-   Transistor Portable Televisions (http://www.videokarma.org/forumdisplay.php?f=183)
-   -   A Little Flat Tube Fun (http://www.videokarma.org/showthread.php?t=246309)

crtfool 10-05-2012 09:20 AM

Sony also had issues with capacitors over the years. The CRT Watchman TVs generally worked well, but their LCD Watchman sets have major capacitor issues - FDL-310, FDL-320, FDL-370, FDL-380, FDL-3500 all die from bad SMT Can Caps. I have several of these models, and they are all bad - I will not buy anymore of them because of this, way too much trouble to replace these caps.

timmy 02-10-2013 05:55 PM

i still wonder how those beams are directed in a flat crt. its just amazing how they did this with the gun straight in and the screen tilted a few degrees and a pic is there.

crtfool 02-10-2013 06:16 PM

The screens in the CRT Watchman sets are not flat, they are sloped, and the beam is scanned with a standard magnetic deflection yoke - very complicated geometry though.

The real marvel was the original FD-210 CRT Watchman that did have a true flat screen - it used electrostatic deflection, and the geometry was much better than in any of the later models with the sloped screens.

Sandy G 02-10-2013 07:34 PM

I remember buying a Sony FD-2 or somesuch 1986,'87, maybe '88, & they had 'em on a "Hanging" rack in a blister pack...Think I gave $35 or so for it...It was the El Cheapo version, no AC plug or ext antenna connection...Cute toy, it did pretty good in a big town, but not so much out here in the Tuilies...

crtfool 02-10-2013 07:49 PM

I remember those. I bought my first CRT Watchman (FD-10, maybe) in 1992 from a garage sale for $5 - it was in pieces - I reassembled it, and it did not work, fried voltage regulator chip - I guess that they used the wrong adapter, and then someone tried to repair it. I did fix it, but was not impressed with the geometry - ended up giving it to someone. I did not buy another 1 of the later generation models, but I did finally buy an FD-210 original model - very happy with it.

Dave A 02-10-2013 10:13 PM

I have a FD-20 that I use for a portable analog test monitor for video paths. I threw a cross-hatch in it once and if it was a car it would have been pulled over for DUI. Movement on the screen hides a lot of sins.

I also have a FD-210 and I had to go look and never noticed the pure flat screen vs. the tilted screen. Now I have to throw a cross-hatch on it and see what happens. I'll try for comparison pix.

AiboPet 02-11-2013 07:15 AM

I run an 'ol FD10 in the front room just to turn on and see the inhouse transmitter and it's media player are still running (both run 24/7). The FD10 is the one with no AC adaptor...so it just sits in the front room on the coffeetable.

A crosshatch on an FD10 looks like BEER GOGGLES. Its a wonder that regular motion video actually does look okay on the little thing. A couple 42A sets I have do have "better" geometry, but they are still a bit strange. I did notice the 42A sets have BETTER geometry running on a wall wart than even a fresh set of C batteries.

crtfool 02-11-2013 02:44 PM

I think that the FD-10 was the cheapest model that they made - and it looks like it is too.

jr_tech 02-11-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crtfool (Post 3061725)
I think that the FD-10 was the cheapest model that they made - and it looks like it is too.

Good enough for the casual viewer!

http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...2&d=1343766112

jr

Dave A 02-11-2013 08:22 PM

2 Attachment(s)
FD-20 and FD-210 pix below. The 210 wins and I cannot figure out how they did the sweep. If you look at the edges around the screen there are three little ports. Two above the screen and one to the lower right. Not sure what they do but they have to play a part. Dilithium beams maybe? Now I gotta try the Pana CT-101 color.

crtfool 02-12-2013 04:21 PM

The FD-20 doesn't look too bad - I had a lot worse on the 1 I gave away, severe pincushion and trapezoid deformation. The FD-210 looks very good.

compucat 02-13-2013 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crtfool (Post 3061797)
The FD-20 doesn't look too bad - I had a lot worse on the 1 I gave away, severe pincushion and trapezoid deformation. The FD-210 looks very good.

There are geometry adjustment pots on the FD-20 that correct for trapezoidal raster. I have noticed the screen geometry varies between examples of this set. The FD-20 does seem to be one of the better models, built before they started cheapening things with the FD-10 which had no picture controls and could not even use an AC adaptor.

The FD-230 is a good set, solidly built and with a 2.7 inch screen.

timmy 02-13-2013 11:43 AM

does anyone know if the plastic front cover can be removed for dust cleaning on the sony fd-10. i know the fd-20 has 2 screws to remove the front for cleaning. i dont want to pry on the fd-10 and break the front.

jr_tech 02-13-2013 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmy (Post 3061848)
does anyone know if the plastic front cover can be removed for dust cleaning on the sony fd-10. i know the fd-20 has 2 screws to remove the front for cleaning. i dont want to pry on the fd-10 and break the front.

I tried on a "parts set" that I have, using several different plastic pry tools, and could not budge it without messing up the plastic around the screen cover. It appears to be solidly glued in place. :( I think that you have to go in from the back, which is not an easy task!

jr

timmy 02-14-2013 05:40 AM

well its not that bad with dust or dead bugs so ill leave it, thanks.

andy 02-14-2013 11:29 AM

...

timmy 02-14-2013 11:55 AM

i noticed that on the fd-10 when the back is taken off extreme care must be applied in putting the back, back on because the micro switch for uhf-vhf broke when i put the back on as i didnt line up the position of the swich relative to where the slider is on the cover. the micro switch has a very thin plastic tab and will break if you look at it the wrong way,lol as mine broke. so i put a little crazy glue to keep the switch in the vhf position.

compucat 02-15-2013 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmy (Post 3061947)
i noticed that on the fd-10 when the back is taken off extreme care must be applied in putting the back, back on because the micro switch for uhf-vhf broke when i put the back on as i didnt line up the position of the swich relative to where the slider is on the cover. the micro switch has a very thin plastic tab and will break if you look at it the wrong way,lol as mine broke. so i put a little crazy glue to keep the switch in the vhf position.

Also I have noticed on the FD-10 and FD-2A that the cabinet plastic is relatively soft and the screws that go direct.y into the plastic can strip out easily. This does not seem to be a problem with the models that came before and after.

timmy 02-15-2013 06:57 AM

yes i found that the plastic is infact soft. well the cheapest way to make them, they did.

Telecolor 3007 07-14-2016 05:27 PM

But how in the world they made the deflection when the gun was underneath?

jr_tech 07-15-2016 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Telecolor 3007 (Post 3166384)
But how in the world they made the deflection when the gun was underneath?

Electron beams can be deflected at 90 degrees or more. It is possible even to make a mirror which can reverse the travel of the beam completely. However, as the beam is deflected more the beam can be de-focused and geometry can suffer. The Sony tvs had considerable keystone correction, and yet the geometry was not very good on these tiny sets.

jr

Electronic M 07-15-2016 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Telecolor 3007 (Post 3166384)
But how in the world they made the deflection when the gun was underneath?

The screen is the back piece of glass. You look through one sheet of glass, through the vacuum then at the screen on the inside of the back wall of the CRT the screen curves gently out toward the viewer at the top. From the electron gun's perspective it it shooting at a very short wide screen....No crazy deflection angles here.

If you had asked a few months back I'd have given you a working Sony paddle CRT set for the cost of shipping.

jr_tech 07-15-2016 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electronic M (Post 3166453)
The screen is the back piece of glass. You look through one sheet of glass, through the vacuum then at the screen on the inside of the back wall of the CRT the screen curves gently out toward the viewer at the top. From the electron gun's perspective it it shooting at a very short wide screen....No crazy deflection angles here.

That is indeed true for the second generation design, the curved phosphor screen allowed the electron beam to land with only modest vertical deflection required. Magnetic deflection was employed for both axes.
The first generation design employed a flat phosphor screen at 90 degrees to the electron gun. A combination of magnetic and electrostatic deflection was used to achieve proper landing of the beam.

http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...5&d=1256418738

jr

timmy 01-28-2017 08:06 AM

Were any of these micro sets made with electrostatic crts ?

jr_tech 01-28-2017 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmy (Post 3177443)
Were any of these micro sets made with electrostatic crts ?

Here is a picture from post #3 of this thread, showing the electrostatic crt that was used in a Sinclair portable:

http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...7&d=1256418738

post #3 : http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...14&postcount=3

jr

timmy 01-28-2017 11:48 AM

I guess that would be the tube in the center ?

jr_tech 01-28-2017 12:48 PM

Yes... notice the fat neck needed to enclose the deflection plates vs the skinny necks with magnetic deflection yokes mounted on them.

Fyi, there is a Sinclair set on eBay right now: http://www.ebay.com/itm/SINCLAIR-MIN...oAAOSwiONYLirh

not affiliated,
jr

timmy 01-28-2017 02:28 PM

Would that one have the electrostatic tube or would it have been in an older model ?

jr_tech 01-28-2017 06:12 PM

Yes, the set is the same model as the one that I got the electrostatic tube that I photographed out of.

jr

Retroplayer 05-14-2020 03:20 PM

I ended up finding your threads after I posted last night and found them very interesting and helpful. My plan is to make an animated face for an old 80's robot, so perfect geometry is not required. I just need the image to show up in a predictable spot and be able to fill up nearly the whole screen. I will also be displaying some text/gui occasionally, so I want that to be somewhat square.


Quote:

Originally Posted by jr_tech (Post 2957951)
Since the demise of most over-the-air analog TV broadcasting, little pocket TVs have been hitting the thrift stores, eBay and CL in droves. Now, I don't have much interest in LC sets, but the little CRT monochrome sets have some appeal to me, in particular, the Sony "watchman" series, with the "flat" CRT.

These little Sony Watchman TVs used what was likely the only design of a "flat" conventional Cathode Ray Tube that met with any commercial success. The design of the tube is really quite interesting. As early as the 50s a couple of designs for "flat" CRTs were promoted...The Akin tube and the Gabor tube promised a "hang on your wall" TV, but, as far as I know no commercial sets were produced. Sinclair poked at a design in the late 70s, but Sony Beat them to the punch by introducing a flat tube set in 1982. These sets worked well and sold well! I think that at 10 bucks or so they are quite collectible.:yes:

Picture #1 is one of my recent finds, an FD-20A. Out of the box these usually work just fine!

Peering *into* a window to view an image is somewhat reminiscent of the viewing experience of the Philco "Safari" ... Picture #2.

I know of two different designs (and several sizes) of the Sony "flat" CRT. On the left is the most common which uses a curved screen and a magnetic deflection (8-735-950-). The CRT on the right (an earlier design) uses a flat screen and a mix of magnetic and electrostatic deflection (8-733-651-23)... Picture #3.

As might be expected, by projecting the electron beam onto the phosphor surface at odd angles, the geometry of the display is somewhat compromised... Picture #4.

I have an FD-40A (4 " curved phosphor screen) on it's way from an eBay seller, will post pictures if it works.

jr


Devicemodder 12-23-2020 12:44 PM

I wonder how well these flat tubes would've worked as beam index tubes...

Devicemodder 02-03-2021 05:55 PM

5 Attachment(s)
I have found that aliexpress is selling flat 4 inch CRTs with driver boards. They have 2 manufacturers, Tosho or sony. The tube looks to be well made. Mind you, it does need the end user to supply the brightness pot and the contrast pot. there is a little bit of distortion near the bottom, but i suspect that's down to the type of tube.

lydnjonny 04-20-2021 12:59 PM

I have a FD-2B.
I'm looking for other models, but alas in the UK, there isn't that many around at reasonable prices.

Brian

MIPS 04-20-2021 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Devicemodder (Post 3231231)
I have found that aliexpress is selling flat 4 inch CRTs with driver boards. They have 2 manufacturers, Tosho or sony. The tube looks to be well made. Mind you, it does need the end user to supply the brightness pot and the contrast pot. there is a little bit of distortion near the bottom, but i suspect that's down to the type of tube.

You could of at least provided links to them. ;)

jr_tech 04-20-2021 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIPS (Post 3233104)
You could of at least provided links to them. ;)

This? https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005...archweb201603_

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005...archweb201603_

jr

MIPS 04-20-2021 08:26 PM

Okay yeah those did not show up when I tried searching, sorry.

Otherwise that price is bang-in for messing around with them. :thmbsp:

Devicemodder 06-05-2021 07:15 PM

see below post.

Devicemodder 06-05-2021 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIPS (Post 3233115)
Okay yeah those did not show up when I tried searching, sorry.

Otherwise that price is bang-in for messing around with them. :thmbsp:

My bad. Here's the link to the one in my pics. https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005...4e8b29114Yl4QR

MIPS 06-05-2021 07:47 PM

I ended up buying two.
For whatever reason the seller you linked to refused to ship until I paid an extra $10 in shipping. In all I paid nearly $60 in shipping. The other dude I did business with (same tube but no bracketing) was a lot easier and cheaper to do business with.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.