![]() |
You're right, I wasn't considering the perversity of the previous "fixer," but if you could identify the current cap values and try replacing only the obviously wrong ones first, you might save some effort.
|
Quote:
(looking it up did not help much ) PLZ forgive if it seems silly to ask, but, I grew up mostly in the digital/ solid state age, tubes were already way out when I was in the Electronics class in HS, “zero beat” may have been covered, perhaps, I may have just forgotten :/ |
The rainbow stripes are at a frequency that is the difference between the color burst frequency and the color oscillator in the TV. This difference is a "beat frequency." The term comes originally from sound and musical instrument tuning.
As you tune the color oscillator, you will see the beat frequency change, visible as the number of rainbow stripes. As you get closer to zero difference between the burst and the oscillator, the number of stripes will decrease and they will get broader. If you get close to zero beat (meaning the oscillator frequency is close to the burst frequency), the phase lock loop should pull in and stabilize the color, but if the detector or control circuit aren't operating, it will be unstable, and you will see the hue of the whole image change randomly. As you continue tuning the oscillator from too high to too low (or vice-versa), the number of stripes will increase again. So, with point J grounded, there is no control voltage, and you should be able to tune the oscillator from too low to too high (or vice-versa) with zero beat somewhere in the middle. With point J ungrounded, if the phase detector is working, a scope will show a sine wave at the beat frequency (of a couple hundred Hz or less) at point J. This corresponds to the rainbow stripes of color phase you see in the picture, because the oscillator frequency is off from the burst frequency by this much. I looked for a good illustration on YouTube, but couldn't find one, so I hope my verbal description is understandable. |
The term "beat frequency" has its origins in acoustics. When two sound waves are of different frequency, they 'beat' against each other, producing a third (or intermediate) note which is the difference between the two. But if the two are identical in frequency and phase, there is "zero beat".
The same thing occurs with RF signals. The beat is sometimes called a heterodyne, as in superheterodyne receivers; the incoming signal 'beats' with a local oscillator, producing the intermediate frequency (or IF) signal which is then amplified and demodulated. |
Quote:
Now that I sort of remember from classes, :p when we were thought AM/FM stuff, but that was sooo long ago :) I was a dumb teen then, a lot of that info on my master hard drive was flushed long ago to make room for other data! :p |
this won't be until the very LAST stages, but this does look perfect for a replacement the focus rect, does it not? https://www.electronicsurplus.com/nt...nium-rectifier
or am I seeing it wrong.? |
something is not right :/
c101,102,103,104 c98,99,100 now new. still cant do color afc. https://imgur.com/ZL7DFjY pin 3 of v23 (removed) phase det https://imgur.com/IsFfC3h pin 1 of v23 (removed) phase det https://imgur.com/rb81uJO pin 1 of v23 (tube in) phase det -did not bother with pic of pin 3 with tube in. https://imgur.com/QuIObvz point J not sure what i should be seeing there, but I don't think that looks right. Edit, What you said about " the number of stripes will decrease and they will get broader. If you get close to zero beat (meaning the oscillator frequency is close to the burst frequency)," an am not seeing this, They roll up,/down but tuning the coil for the osc, never made them decrease/ get broader, they did stop moving at one point... which makes me suspect it's off freq. ( a guess ) so when i saw this... https://www.ebay.com/itm/RCA-CTC-15-...YAAOSwrHtcUie2 it was too good to pass up, it may not fix anything... or, who knows... |
Point J is the filtered phase detector output, so what you're looking for there is the few hundred Hz (at most) sine wave indicating how far off frequency you are. this is like a fairly low audio frequency tone, so, set the scope horizontal rate much slower, say 1 or 2 milliseconds per division.
|
pins 1 and 3 of the phase detector should have the gated burst, and that seems to be what you have, so it's OK. Pin 2 should have the continuous wave at 3.58 MHz from the oscillator. The schematic says 10 volts p-p - the copy is not clear if there is any pulse waveform or beat note waveform superimposed or just pure sine wave.
Yes, it is possible the crystal is bad, but I was under the impression that when the crystal dies the oscillator stops in these sets, and you definitely have the oscillator running |
Rolling up or down shows that you are changing the frequency, but if you can't get it to slow down to zero beat with point J grounded, there is something wrong in the oscillator (or maybe control) circuit. The caps you replaced would not be critical unless completely dead or very wrong values. Look for trouble with the cap values in the oscillator and control circuits.
C112, C118, C114, C111, C108. Due to C108, there should be no 3.58 MHz energy whatsoever at point J, only the low frequency beat note. |
I will start hitting that area this weekend, meanwhile, I took the removed caps to work and checked them with a calibrated capacitor tester , it does not test leakage :( , but this is the result.
c98 .01 = .005 c99 .01 = .013 c100 .001 = .001 c101 330pf = 298pf c102 330pf = 342pf c103 330pf = 351 pf c104 330pf = 339 pf I prob did not have to replace some of them, :/ but ya can't test them in circuit, and I can't sneak this tester home! :p |
Quote:
As you can see above, c98 was WAY out of tolerance (low) for 20% C99 just barely inside (high) C100 OK , C101-104 2 within , 2 out of tol for %5... I just hope that this won't be the same for all caps in the set :( |
C108, R167, and C109 in combination with the output impedance of the phase detector (two 1 Megohm resistors in parallel) form a classic phase lock loop filter. At frequencies below 48 Hz (the combination of R167 and C109), the frequency response is rolling off from 1.0 at DC to 1/15 above 48 Hz (33k/500k). The response is flat up to about 480 Hz (the combination of R167 and C108) and rolls off again for frequencies above 480 Hz.
The bandwidth and transient response of the closed loop (and the amount of phase error due to frequency drift with temperature) is also very much dependent on the loop gain, which involves three factors: the gain of the phase detector (volts per radian); the gain of the control tube (picofarads per volt); and the gain of the oscillator response (radians per second per picofarad). [radians per second = 2 times pi times Hz] To design this circuit, you would measure/design the gains for each of these stages individually, and calculate the RC filter values to give the desired frequency and transient response (damping factor). |
just an " out there " question, the Sams says r164/r165 as matched pair, same with 149/150, right now, the person who worked on it before me has 5% carbon film ones in there, i only checked by looking that they were correct value, how critical is the " matched pair" ? should I bother replacing them with 1% metal film ones I have ( checking that they are as close as they can be to each other via a calibrated VOM ) or just leave it as it is now with the 5% ones in? i have no idea if this person checked for them to be a " match " or not, or does it not really matter with 5%?
|
Looking at the photo of the color board, it appears the original resistors were carbon composition. I think these could change value by a couple of percent due to heat of soldering, subsequent moisture absorption, etc. even if initially matched. However, it's hard to guess what they had in mind since they don't tell you.
If you just throw in 5% tolerance resistors, the center voltage could vary by as much as +/- 1 volt (because there is 40 volts across them), so that must be too much, since unmatched resistors are not allowed here. 1% resistors would cut this down to +/- 0.2 volts, which certainly must be close enough, since this is about the closest tolerance you could achieve with an analog ohmmeter anyway. Since carbon comp resistors probably would not hold such a tight tolerance, my guess is that somewhere in between, like a 2% match, is OK. If this were a professional monitor circuit, it likely would have a pot between the two fixed resistors, with a procedure for zeroing the output voltage under certain test conditions. |
By the way, it lools to me like DC is blocked everywhere in the phase detector circuit, so you could measure these two resistors without unsoldering them.
No such luck with the color killer detector, because of the DC path through R147. |
Quote:
mouser # 71-CMF551M0000DHR6 And even though they are 4 hours from me, It cost more to ship it than the parts themselves, not worth it. :p |
notes / thoughts about color AFC setup so far.
Set color killer control fully CCW, set Tint control to center of it's range.
-notes killer in full off setting to be set later, Tint mid range to be calibrated later. Connect color bar generator to ant inputs, adjust for normal color reception. Short pin 1 of Burst Amp, V22 to gnd. notes, suggestion of color bar generator was for non-changing stable input, and any paused video from DVD or the like can be used, or else levels will change as video moves, changes, Shorting of burst amp pin 1 is to be sure no killer input is going to it & it is in fully on state. Easy access to pin 1 via killer pot R10. Connect DC probe of volt meter to pin 1 of phase detector through a 470k resistor. (V23) adjust A15 for max deflection ( most voltage ? ) if no reading, osc is not running, adjust A16 to start, & retry. Remove short from pin 1 of burst amp, adjust A17 for max deflection on meter, make sure osc is running and locked in. notes , Phase detector looks to be isolated , via the 330 pf caps and fed pulses from L30, so I assume the 470k resistor is used to not load it down when doing this setup, I did see the voltage peak when adjusting A15 & A17 , but no kind of “lock” per-sey, just different degrees of barber poling when the short was removed from the burst amp, but it DID have some visual effect when removed. Short point J to GND, remove meter from prev step, adjust A16 until color bars stand still or drift slowly. Remove short from point J , check to see that color bars sync with low input signal. Retouch A16 for best hold as needed. notes, I tried this step, even though I was never able to get any sort of “lock/hold” as mentioned in the step before, and no adjustment of A16 was able to get a hold, just as mentioned above, varying degrees of barber poling. I have not gone on to the last steps, obviously. I did see healthy pulses into the phase det, ( shown in prev entry ) , and at point J, a sign-wave, at 1 ms per division on the scope, but could also see noise at higher scan rates, ( not sure if that's normal or not, prob is. ) I am still not done going over the osc / osc-cont area yet cap wise, not really found much yet, but SOMETHING, is not right, cause with the fed in video, going through that AFC set up, I should have been able to get a lock of some sort by now. And as I mentioned, I know for sure that L24 & L25 were replaced before I got this thing, and never really adjusted as far as I can tell, but as mentioned a while back, this is not related to my current headache, and just hope it does not come back to bite later... |
At this point it would be helpful if you had an accurate frequency counter and could measure the range of adjustment with L31 (A16) to verify that you are always on the low side or high side and cannot get nominal frequency. It seems that there must be something wrong with the oscillator circuit (wrong capacitor value or such).
C112, C118, or C114 would be prime suspects, or even one of the .01 bypasses (C110, C113), since you say the board was mangled by whoever had it last. |
Quote:
That guy turns out, did NOT have a new xtal, and ended refunding me :( so if on the odd chance it is bad, I'm not sure what to replace it with. The bottom of the pcb has white flux residue all over it, not sure WTF type of solder / flux was used, and it is a bitch to get off, but i got a lot off around the osc area, i have no idea if it was causing problems, bit it is ugly.. |
One of these should work:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/10-x-3-5795...fe97e#shpCntId What have you tried to remove the flux? |
isopropyl alcohol 99, Chemtronics ES835B , and a remover for water base flux,
what ever was used, it is very hard to get off. I can tell, that the untouched parts of the set have OLD rma flux on them still. this i almost never used any more in production, but was used a lot back then. we use water soluble and no-clean,( lead free) I had to get special order leaded rma solder to work on this. when the resistors were replaced, some unknown type of solder was used, and the flux mix caused a white scale that has to be almost scraped off, not alcohol or Chemtronics would really soften it much, I gave it a good try and got some off but was afraid of damaging things. 17 pF on the crystal? that narrows things down a lot ( so may options looking them up :o ) i assume Mouser #: 520-HCA357-17X is the same? |
Actually, I think Zenith used 17 pf, and RCA used something larger, like 22 pf. So search on ebay to see if you can find something like that. But if not, I think the ones cut for 17 will work with a slightly different tuning of A16. The important thing is that the crystal sees the equivalent of the capacitance it is cut for as the result of everything that is attached to it. Crystals tuned for one or the other will change the gain of the control stage, which will affect the pull-in range and transient response to some extent.
|
Mouser has crystals @ both 20pf and 30pf.
I don't know for sure that the original is bad, but I don't know that it's good either. I do know it's oscillating, but something seems to be off with the circuit. If I understand things correctly, with point J grounded, I should be able to hook a frequency counter to L33 ( general area ) and be able to adjust L31 (A16) to get 3.579545 mhz, and as well as a respectable range above and below. |
I wonder if the door knob who worked on it before you used something like acid core plumbing solder?... You're never supposed to use that on electronics but some people did, infact if you go back to the 20s and 30s some electronics makers used it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The fact that it's oscillating and the frequency doesn't go all over the place as you adjust it would indicate that the crystal is working. |
from a pic of the bottom I took when Rocket wanted to see how my switches were wired,
https://i.imgur.com/lF885FA.jpg if you look very close, you can see the krud :/ |
So far, replacing caps has not helped :(
https://imgur.com/uodtlrG almost all caps in the OSC circuit new, point J grounded, this is as close to 3.579545 i can get. not sure what else to try other than replacing the carbon film-resistors that were put in there with 1% metal film. The crystal IS OK. removed and tested in x-tal tester, it was on freq. and got a really neat pic with crystal removed, all reds were green, there was color lock, so burst amp and related circuits are working. not sure what else to look at other than the resistors that were put in before i got it, I only checked visually they they were right value. 5% carbon film in there now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also agree that the green without the crystal is an indication that the oscillator is not running. More sleuthing needed. Dumb question, but do you have any scope probes, meters, jumper wires, or etc. attached when you are trying to tune the oscillator frequency? Which caps in the oscillator circuit are NOT new? |
https://imgur.com/9HcgQcz
pic with crystal unhooked when i took the readings with that meter, both times, there was nothing hooked to the set but the meter shown in the post hooked to L33. right now c120 and 123 are not new, as they are under the can of L32 and i really did not want to remove it if i did not have to. |
C120 and C123 should not affect oscillator frequency, so I think no worries there.
|
Does L31 measure 8 ohms, as the schematic says?
|
How far have you turned the core of L31 when you try to tune it? Do you think you could remove it completely without breaking it? (Trying to find out if you are always on the low side of 3.58 Mhz).
|
Quote:
i will check the resistance of it when i replace the 5% resistors with 1% in the area, i got a huge box of them of most common values, so it wont be much of a problem to change them. the larger ones, 1w are most likely OK anyway |
OPEN COIL!!
it read 12 ohms had to operate on it to get it to 8 ohms. and then.. https://imgur.com/MNNx88t https://imgur.com/CqMWDXJ :banana::nutz: |
Looks good!
It is probably time to fix the cataract and adjust the greyscale to be less blue. |
Quote:
or could this be a symptom of the a symptom of the new coils in bandpass never being adjusted? At this point, i don't even have the Convergence assembly on the neck, its plugged in but I made no attempt to set output levels , or adjust anything, spent all this time trying to get color, now on to next things, i guess! |
If your color control is set too high that may be causing fluctuation. In tube sets, if you overdrive the chroma it will get noisy and flickery.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.