Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums

Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums (http://www.videokarma.org/index.php)
-   Early Color Television (http://www.videokarma.org/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   NTSC Pennant? (http://www.videokarma.org/showthread.php?t=246324)

Phil Nelson 10-25-2009 02:51 PM

NTSC Pennant?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Does anyone have a nice high-res version of the NTSC pennant? This is a small version of an image that I scanned from an old TV book. There are problems with colors bleeding through from the other side of the page, etc. I have seen the little image at Ed Reitan's website, but that's not what I'm looking for as a screen background.

Phil Nelson

old_tv_nut 10-26-2009 08:33 PM

The only other place I've seen this is on the cover of the Jan 54 IRE Proceedings, and every copy I know of has been loved to death - in much worse condition than what you have. Sorry I can't help - good luck.

Pete Deksnis 10-26-2009 09:40 PM

I wonder if it was ever meant to be used as a televised image. May just have been a print illustration. I suppose one could photoshop the correct hues and make a DVD, but what would be a correct/proper orange?

old_tv_nut 10-26-2009 10:37 PM

how's this?

Test image: note +/- I bars and +/- Q bars in upper left (Y, I, Q all full bandwidth)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2465/...3ea58e0d_o.jpg

Q turned off (transmitter side, I filtered at to 1.5 Mhz bandwidth):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2650/...fe8101cf_o.jpg

I turned off (transmitter side, Q filtered to 0.5 Mhz bandwidth):
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2774/...36c43d42_o.jpg

Encoded and decoded with I/Q demods, subcarrier notch filter in Y channel, shows: cross color in awning; Q smear on green-magenta edge; subcarrier dots on color bar edges.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2704/...d925c47b_o.jpg

NOTE: computer simulation was simplified by making the color subcarrier phase coherent with the pixel placement in these images, resulting in the slight aspect ratio distortion seen here.

jeyurkon 10-27-2009 12:24 AM

Interesting! John

Phil Nelson 10-27-2009 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete Deksnis (Post 2958260)
May just have been a print illustration.

That seems likely. The plate in this book just reproduces the IRE illustration, which certainly isn't in TV format.

I think I have seen a recommendation from you for this book, in fact -- Basic Television by Bernard Grob.

I have been using this as a computer desktop background and thought someone might happen to have a better version. The scan I made looks kinda fuzzed when blown up to 1440 x 900 resolution. Still jolly, though.

Phil

Pete Deksnis 10-27-2009 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old_tv_nut (Post 2958267)
how's this?

Oops! (slaps forehead w/left hand) I shoulda knowed!
:bash:

+I = orange

Pete Deksnis 10-27-2009 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old_tv_nut (Post 2958267)

Encoded and decoded with I/Q demods, subcarrier notch filter in Y channel, shows: cross color in awning....
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2704/...d925c47b_o.jpg

Cool! I had not noticed cross color in the awning before your pointing it out. Neat simulation.

Pete

Pete Deksnis 10-27-2009 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Nelson (Post 2958275)
That seems likely. The plate in this book just reproduces the IRE illustration, which certainly isn't in TV format.

I think I have seen a recommendation from you for this book, in fact -- Basic Television by Bernard Grob.

I have been using this as a computer desktop background and thought someone might happen to have a better version. The scan I made looks kinda fuzzed when blown up to 1440 x 900 resolution. Still jolly, though.

Phil

The printers must still have been setting up the press when they printed my color plate as it is not as good as the image you posted. Your color is more accurate -- especially yellow -- and so is your registration. Like to get my hands on the original color separations. It'd be like Chuck Pharis acquiring the original RCA Indian Head artwork.

Pete

Joel Cairo 10-27-2009 03:08 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here's an enlarged (and slightly color-corrected) version of the original image that was posted above... it could still be sharpened a bit, if that's your preference.

The size is now 1024 x 599.

Hope this is useful...

-Kevin

Phil Nelson 10-27-2009 07:54 PM

Cool. How did you do color correction? I'm a dolt when it comes to using Paintshop. I have the original scan (820K !) at http://antiqueradio.org/art/temp/NTSCBackground.jpg .

Phil

Joel Cairo 10-28-2009 02:30 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Wow-- thanks for supplying the original scan, Phil!

I've similarly color corrected the original (as well as did a quick bit of clean-up to even out the lighter blue on the right, and get rid of a few dark spots and image flaws), and reduced it to the same 1024 x 599 size. The reduction route gives much nicer results than blowing up a small image, since the final picture retains a lot of the texture of the original, which my blow-up wouldn't have had, even if it were sharpened.

Looks decent enough, I'd say... :)

-Kevin

Phil Nelson 10-28-2009 11:40 AM

That's much better. It's already on my desktop. Thanks!

Phil

wa2ise 10-29-2009 01:32 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Did a little photoshopping http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...6&d=1256797967

And the digital version as well :D http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...5&d=1256797967

W.B. 10-30-2009 12:12 AM

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2465/...3ea58e0d_o.jpg

It seems, based on the colors as registered in this JPEG file, that 205° would be the RGB position for -I, 24° for +I, 275° for +Q and 95° for -Q, would that sound correct? (Being that RGB values are different from the phase positions in video language.) I had done my own research of position values in Photoshop and Corel Photo-Paint 11, and had come up with:
- 204° for -I
- 24° for +I
- 272° for +Q
- 92° for -Q

old_tv_nut 10-30-2009 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete Deksnis (Post 2958281)
Cool! I had not noticed cross color in the awning before your pointing it out. Neat simulation.

Pete

Note: most of it is in the I channel, and disappears with narrowband demods
I'm out of town and will post when I get home.

old_tv_nut 10-30-2009 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by W.B. (Post 2958578)

It seems, based on the colors as registered in this JPEG file, that 205° would be the RGB position for -I, 24° for +I, 275° for +Q and 95° for -Q, would that sound correct? (Being that RGB values are different from the phase positions in video language.) I had done my own research of position values in Photoshop and Corel Photo-Paint 11, and had come up with:
- 204° for -I
- 24° for +I
- 272° for +Q
- 92° for -Q

I'll have to check out the code when I get back home. This simulation was done in Photoshop by writing custom Photoshop filters to do the matrixing, chroma modulation, filtering, and demodulation, would you believe? I just love perverting software to do things I want that it never was intended to do.
By defining the +/- I and +/- Q subcarrier peaks to fall on pixel locations, modulation and demodulation can be simulated by multiplying by a pattern of
(+1,0,-1,0) or (0,+1,0,-1).

The +I channel should be at 33° electrically with respect to scaled R-Y and scaled B-Y, and the other three phases at 90° increments. You have to be careful that you are working with properly scaled R-Y (divided by 1.14 if I recall correctly) and B-Y (divided by 2.03 if I recall correctly) before converting to I,Q. The values you found may be correct when calculating angles in the RGB domain, that is, with straight R-Y and B-Y.

W.B. 10-30-2009 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old_tv_nut (Post 2958580)
I'll have to check out the code when I get back home. This simulation was done in Photoshop by writing custom Photoshop filters to do the matrixing, chroma modulation, filtering, and demodulation, would you believe? I just love perverting software to do things I want that it never was intended to do.
By defining the +/- I and +/- Q subcarrier peaks to fall on pixel locations, modulation and demodulation can be simulated by multiplying by a pattern of
(+1,0,-1,0) or (0,+1,0,-1).

The +I channel should be at 33° electrically with respect to scaled R-Y and scaled B-Y, and the other three phases at 90° increments. You have to be careful that you are working with properly scaled R-Y (divided by 1.14 if I recall correctly) and B-Y (divided by 2.03 if I recall correctly) before converting to I,Q. The values you found may be correct when calculating angles in the RGB domain, that is, with straight R-Y and B-Y.

I found that +(R-Y) in RGB domain was 340°, while -(R-Y) was 160°; +(B-Y) was 250° and -(B-Y) [a.k.a. NTSC 'burst'] was 70°; and G-Y=0 values were 43° and 223°. I also found the +/-I and +/-Q values through taking the YCbCr calculations in color bars and changing the luma from 16 to 126.

I am aware that RGB values are different from what is registered on color vectorscopes.

old_tv_nut 10-31-2009 06:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Just want to point out to those reading the back and forth here about hue angles, that the Photoshop hue doesn't necessarily bear a direct relation to the NTSC chroma phase angle. The color produced on the screen for a given NTSC phase angle varies depending on the brightness and saturation of the color, due to the CRT gamma characteristic (non-linear response of light output vs. drive voltage).

This illustration "NTSC Color Television Standards" shows how the hue varies with saturation for a given phase.

+I is at 123 degrees (electrical) which clearly is not a straight line on the chromaticity diagram.

old_tv_nut 10-31-2009 07:13 PM

By the way, the non-linear effect on hue for a constant electrical phase is plainly visible in the image with Q turned off - compare the "yellow" color bar with the "red" one, or look at the difference between the "green" "cyan" and "blue" bars. All of these (like every other part of this image) have signals only on the +I or -I electrical axis, but clearly have different hues on the screen.

old_tv_nut 10-31-2009 07:20 PM

Here is the way the picture looks with Q turned off and a flat gray substituted for Y.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2672/...afb4e20e_o.jpg

Note 2 things:

1) the hue is much more constant
2) the luminance is not constant, however, because the non-linear display causes an increase in luminance with increased chroma

old_tv_nut 10-31-2009 08:16 PM

Here's the narrowband decode version I promised:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2750/...9b55002a_o.jpg

Phil Nelson 03-25-2010 04:57 PM

Back to the pennant, does anyone know what the five little pennants are supposed to represent? The illustration's caption does not mention 'em, nor does the text on page 597 that references the illustration.

Phil Nelson

old_tv_nut 03-25-2010 07:41 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Nelson (Post 2969235)
Back to the pennant, does anyone know what the five little pennants are supposed to represent? The illustration's caption does not mention 'em, nor does the text on page 597 that references the illustration.

Phil Nelson

They were used as printer's devices to tick off highlights of the contents on the front cover of the IRE Proceedings.

Phil Nelson 03-26-2010 01:01 AM

Gee willikers, you guys know everything! Can I have your magazine? :)

Seriously, thanks for the pointer. That journal content appears to be available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ . My brother-in-law is an IEEE member. I'll try to bribe him into getting those articles for me.

Phil Nelson

Phil Nelson 01-31-2011 02:50 PM

Got an interesting email today. This guy appears to have the original painting used for the IRE magazine cover. He bought it at an auction years ago and had no idea what it was (or why the row of little pennants) until he read the article on my website.

http://antiqueradio.org/art/temp/NTSCPennantOrig.jpg

He says it's done with gouache on illustration board. On the back it is stamped "Associated Freelance Artists" from NYC, with another label that appears to order halftone color prints.

I asked him if he's able to provide a better quality photo, which would make a nice footnote for the article. Incidentally, I did eventually get my hands on a copy of the IRE magazine (thanks, John!).

Phil Nelson
http://antiqueradio.org/index.html

cbenham 02-01-2011 03:31 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Nelson (Post 2958275)
That seems likely. The plate in this book just reproduces the IRE illustration, which certainly isn't in TV format.

I think I have seen a recommendation from you for this book, in fact -- Basic Television by Bernard Grob.

I have been using this as a computer desktop background and thought someone might happen to have a better version. The scan I made looks kinda fuzzed when blown up to 1440 x 900 resolution. Still jolly, though. Phil

I found two versions in my files and I think they both came from attachments on Videokarma. Cliff

ChrisW6ATV 06-09-2011 01:39 AM

Here is another scan from that same book by Bernard Grob. I didn't realize it was discussed here until I re-read this topic after randomly picking up a book on my shelf, seeing the flag in it, and remembering this discussion.

http://70.36.238.5/ct100/NTSCflagsmall.jpg

If anyone wants it, I have an 8MB 5000x3000-pixel JPEG of this version, or the original 52MB uncompressed TIFF of the whole book page.

West 06-09-2011 03:43 PM

Wow! The things a person can learn from you guys! ...and I'm blown away by all the efforts expended on crafting these images. Interesting!

I and Q signals, computer generated subcarrier effects, NTSC flags...this is truly a world of it's own.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.