![]() |
NTSC Pennant?
1 Attachment(s)
Does anyone have a nice high-res version of the NTSC pennant? This is a small version of an image that I scanned from an old TV book. There are problems with colors bleeding through from the other side of the page, etc. I have seen the little image at Ed Reitan's website, but that's not what I'm looking for as a screen background.
Phil Nelson |
The only other place I've seen this is on the cover of the Jan 54 IRE Proceedings, and every copy I know of has been loved to death - in much worse condition than what you have. Sorry I can't help - good luck.
|
I wonder if it was ever meant to be used as a televised image. May just have been a print illustration. I suppose one could photoshop the correct hues and make a DVD, but what would be a correct/proper orange?
|
how's this?
Test image: note +/- I bars and +/- Q bars in upper left (Y, I, Q all full bandwidth) http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2465/...3ea58e0d_o.jpg Q turned off (transmitter side, I filtered at to 1.5 Mhz bandwidth): http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2650/...fe8101cf_o.jpg I turned off (transmitter side, Q filtered to 0.5 Mhz bandwidth): http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2774/...36c43d42_o.jpg Encoded and decoded with I/Q demods, subcarrier notch filter in Y channel, shows: cross color in awning; Q smear on green-magenta edge; subcarrier dots on color bar edges. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2704/...d925c47b_o.jpg NOTE: computer simulation was simplified by making the color subcarrier phase coherent with the pixel placement in these images, resulting in the slight aspect ratio distortion seen here. |
Interesting! John
|
Quote:
I think I have seen a recommendation from you for this book, in fact -- Basic Television by Bernard Grob. I have been using this as a computer desktop background and thought someone might happen to have a better version. The scan I made looks kinda fuzzed when blown up to 1440 x 900 resolution. Still jolly, though. Phil |
Quote:
:bash: +I = orange |
Quote:
Pete |
Quote:
Pete |
1 Attachment(s)
Here's an enlarged (and slightly color-corrected) version of the original image that was posted above... it could still be sharpened a bit, if that's your preference.
The size is now 1024 x 599. Hope this is useful... -Kevin |
Cool. How did you do color correction? I'm a dolt when it comes to using Paintshop. I have the original scan (820K !) at http://antiqueradio.org/art/temp/NTSCBackground.jpg .
Phil |
1 Attachment(s)
Wow-- thanks for supplying the original scan, Phil!
I've similarly color corrected the original (as well as did a quick bit of clean-up to even out the lighter blue on the right, and get rid of a few dark spots and image flaws), and reduced it to the same 1024 x 599 size. The reduction route gives much nicer results than blowing up a small image, since the final picture retains a lot of the texture of the original, which my blow-up wouldn't have had, even if it were sharpened. Looks decent enough, I'd say... :) -Kevin |
That's much better. It's already on my desktop. Thanks!
Phil |
2 Attachment(s)
Did a little photoshopping http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...6&d=1256797967
And the digital version as well :D http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...5&d=1256797967 |
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2465/...3ea58e0d_o.jpg
It seems, based on the colors as registered in this JPEG file, that 205° would be the RGB position for -I, 24° for +I, 275° for +Q and 95° for -Q, would that sound correct? (Being that RGB values are different from the phase positions in video language.) I had done my own research of position values in Photoshop and Corel Photo-Paint 11, and had come up with: - 204° for -I - 24° for +I - 272° for +Q - 92° for -Q |
Quote:
I'm out of town and will post when I get home. |
Quote:
By defining the +/- I and +/- Q subcarrier peaks to fall on pixel locations, modulation and demodulation can be simulated by multiplying by a pattern of (+1,0,-1,0) or (0,+1,0,-1). The +I channel should be at 33° electrically with respect to scaled R-Y and scaled B-Y, and the other three phases at 90° increments. You have to be careful that you are working with properly scaled R-Y (divided by 1.14 if I recall correctly) and B-Y (divided by 2.03 if I recall correctly) before converting to I,Q. The values you found may be correct when calculating angles in the RGB domain, that is, with straight R-Y and B-Y. |
Quote:
I am aware that RGB values are different from what is registered on color vectorscopes. |
1 Attachment(s)
Just want to point out to those reading the back and forth here about hue angles, that the Photoshop hue doesn't necessarily bear a direct relation to the NTSC chroma phase angle. The color produced on the screen for a given NTSC phase angle varies depending on the brightness and saturation of the color, due to the CRT gamma characteristic (non-linear response of light output vs. drive voltage).
This illustration "NTSC Color Television Standards" shows how the hue varies with saturation for a given phase. +I is at 123 degrees (electrical) which clearly is not a straight line on the chromaticity diagram. |
By the way, the non-linear effect on hue for a constant electrical phase is plainly visible in the image with Q turned off - compare the "yellow" color bar with the "red" one, or look at the difference between the "green" "cyan" and "blue" bars. All of these (like every other part of this image) have signals only on the +I or -I electrical axis, but clearly have different hues on the screen.
|
Here is the way the picture looks with Q turned off and a flat gray substituted for Y.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2672/...afb4e20e_o.jpg Note 2 things: 1) the hue is much more constant 2) the luminance is not constant, however, because the non-linear display causes an increase in luminance with increased chroma |
Here's the narrowband decode version I promised:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2750/...9b55002a_o.jpg |
Back to the pennant, does anyone know what the five little pennants are supposed to represent? The illustration's caption does not mention 'em, nor does the text on page 597 that references the illustration.
Phil Nelson |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Gee willikers, you guys know everything! Can I have your magazine? :)
Seriously, thanks for the pointer. That journal content appears to be available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ . My brother-in-law is an IEEE member. I'll try to bribe him into getting those articles for me. Phil Nelson |
Got an interesting email today. This guy appears to have the original painting used for the IRE magazine cover. He bought it at an auction years ago and had no idea what it was (or why the row of little pennants) until he read the article on my website.
http://antiqueradio.org/art/temp/NTSCPennantOrig.jpg He says it's done with gouache on illustration board. On the back it is stamped "Associated Freelance Artists" from NYC, with another label that appears to order halftone color prints. I asked him if he's able to provide a better quality photo, which would make a nice footnote for the article. Incidentally, I did eventually get my hands on a copy of the IRE magazine (thanks, John!). Phil Nelson http://antiqueradio.org/index.html |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Here is another scan from that same book by Bernard Grob. I didn't realize it was discussed here until I re-read this topic after randomly picking up a book on my shelf, seeing the flag in it, and remembering this discussion.
http://70.36.238.5/ct100/NTSCflagsmall.jpg If anyone wants it, I have an 8MB 5000x3000-pixel JPEG of this version, or the original 52MB uncompressed TIFF of the whole book page. |
Wow! The things a person can learn from you guys! ...and I'm blown away by all the efforts expended on crafting these images. Interesting!
I and Q signals, computer generated subcarrier effects, NTSC flags...this is truly a world of it's own. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.