Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums

Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums (http://www.videokarma.org/index.php)
-   Antique Radio (http://www.videokarma.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Troubles with an old car radio. (http://www.videokarma.org/showthread.php?t=252464)

madmike17 10-26-2011 09:08 PM

Troubles with an old car radio.
 
The high voltage section of my Truetone (made by Wells-Gardner) C11 car radio is not functioning. you can see on the schematic the area is marked by a dotted line. The transformer ohms out ok, but it is still not putting our any voltage at all. Vibrator is clearly vibrating, after being opened up and loosened up after many years of no use. I am not sure if the transformer is bad, or if the vibrator points are not conducting properly. Any ideas? It has been completely recapped, btw. Schematic: http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByM...0/M0023530.pdf

madmike17 10-26-2011 09:13 PM

Also, he vibrator currently installed is a radiart 5400. This may or may not even be the correct vibrator. I noticed one pin was cut off to make it fit the socket.

bob91343 10-26-2011 10:30 PM

You should see a square wave on the transformer winding. You do have an oscilloscope, right? If not, get one.

It appears to use a self rectifying vibrator. They have a lot of contacts, any of which could not be operating. It also appears that two different vibrators may have been used. There is no indication of vibrator type on the diagram.

In a set that old, the buffer capacitor (the one across the secondary of the transformer) may be bad, which places a lot of stress on the contacts. That's the first thing to replace, along with the filter capacitors.

old_coot88 10-27-2011 12:54 PM

That's called a synchronous vibrator. A second set of points does the job of rectifying the stepped-up voltage coming out of the transformer.
A radio using a synchronous viber is sensitive to supply voltage polarity. That is, if the radio is negative ground and you reverse the input polarity, the stepped-up voltage will also have reverse polarity. It'll be putting "B-minus" voltage on the filter caps instead of "B plus" voltage. :eek::yikes:

madmike17 10-27-2011 04:04 PM

I wonder if I installed it backwards last time? It ran for about a minute, and faint crackles came through the speaker, but no sound. Then the 10 mfd cap let out its guts. I couldnt find a reason, I just figured it was defective. I also later found out that the audio interstage transformer was bad. If it is just the contacts, would a little filing help? Ill try to find a scope if I can.

old_coot88 10-27-2011 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmike17 (Post 3017136)
I wonder if I installed it backwards last time?

It's doubtful the vib could be installed backward. But if the supply voltage to the radio is the wrong polarity, the filter caps will also get reversed polarity. This is true only with synchronous vibrators, not with radios using tube rectifiers (0Z4, 6X5 etc.). With tubes, the supply polarity doesn't make any difference.
Quote:

It ran for about a minute, and faint crackles came through the speaker, but no sound. Then the 10 mfd cap let out its guts.
If the 10mfd cap you're referring to is C34, it's right on the main B+ line from the transformer, and it would definitely 'let out its guts' under reverse ("B minus") polarity. Two more caps 'downstream' from it, C29a and C29b, would also get seriously cooked (unless C34 dead-shorted and spared them that fate).
Quote:

I couldnt find a reason, I just figured it was defective.
It sure sounds like reverse supply polarity. Had you installed it in a car when this happened, or when you had it on the bench?
Quote:

I also later found out that the audio interstage transformer was bad. If it is just the contacts, would a little filing help? Ill try to find a scope if I can.
If the audio interstage transformer open, or what?
The vibrator contacts might still be OK if you didn't run it that way too long.

madmike17 10-27-2011 06:04 PM

It was C29B, and it tested ok despite all the fluids that came out of it on my $20 harbor freight multimeter. The transformer T6 had an open primary, which I used a capacitor to bypass as show on the philco website. I believe the technique was called rc coupling. It seems like it must be a problem with the vibrator contacts. Would filing them be of any help, or would they be damaged?

old_coot88 10-27-2011 06:04 PM

Before attempting any filing, I would see how the vibrator runs with correct polarity. It may be OK.

madmike17 10-27-2011 06:08 PM

The vibrator can be reversed in the socket for a different polarity Im pretty sure. It will be used with negative ground on a 1947 international pickup.

old_coot88 10-27-2011 06:11 PM

Addendum to earlier post

As a side note,

there is a quick and easy way to convert one of these radios to run on reverse polarity. I used to do it with Buick (negative ground) radios for use in Chrysler product (positive ground) cars. All you do is swap the transformer's two HV secondary leads (leaving the center tap alone). And presto, the radio runs fine on reverse supply polarity.

Doggone, I never saw one before where the vibrator itself can be reversed. L'arn sumpthin new every day.:D

madmike17 10-27-2011 06:21 PM

Its an 8 pin socket, the vibrator has 4 pins. there is an arrow on the chassis which can point to either a + or - marked on the vibrator. So to be clear: I should connect the pin connecting to the coil to 6 volts and the case to ground. The pulsed DC can be measured with a scope on the two larger pins. Is this what needs to be tested now?

old_coot88 10-27-2011 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmike17 (Post 3017148)
Its an 8 pin socket, the vibrator has 4 pins. there is an arrow on the chassis which can point to either a + or - marked on the vibrator. So to be clear: I should connect the pin connecting to the coil to 6 volts and the case to ground. The pulsed DC can be measured with a scope on the two larger pins. Is this what needs to be tested now?

Here's what I would do FWIW: Put your meter across C34 and 'blip' power to the radio just long enough to see that correct polarity is appearing across C34. That'll confirm if supply polarity is correct. Then switch the meter to AC, power up the radio and see if you've got equal AC voltage from center tap to both ends of the HV secondary. If so, this'll pretty much confirm the vib is healthy and the points are good.
I always looked at filing points as the last resort.

Well son of a gun, upon blowing the schematic up to full size, C34 is actually .10 mfd, not a 10mfd electrolytic as i originally thought. That's why C34 didn't get cooked by reverse polarity and C29 did.

madmike17 10-27-2011 06:58 PM

There is no voltage on either C34 or any part of the secondary. the schematic isnt really making sense to me right now though. It seems that the pin out of the vibrator is viewed from the top, rather than the prong side as it says based on looking at the vibrators actual internal wiring.

old_coot88 10-27-2011 07:08 PM

Hm. Can you hear it buzzing at all with the radio powered up and the tubes lit?

madmike17 10-27-2011 07:21 PM

Yes, the vibrator clearly runs. The only solution I can think of is to just turn the vibrator around. Could this be damaging if I'm wrong? What if i just disconnected the center tap to see if there is voltage when the vibrator is switched so that nothing could be harmed? Also, voltage off the center tap should be DC, right? It seems that if the vibrator was reversed, the result would be AC coming through because it is not cancelled out.

old_coot88 10-27-2011 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmike17 (Post 3017161)
Yes, the vibrator clearly runs. The only solution I can think of is to just turn the vibrator around. Could this be damaging if I'm wrong? What if i just disconnected the center tap to see if there is voltage when the vibrator is switched so that nothing could be harmed?

That's a good thought. But leave C34 in-circuit and disconnect everything 'downstream' from it. C34 can't be hurt by reverse polarity, even with full "B minus" voltage on it.
Quote:

Also, voltage off the center tap should be DC, right?
Yes. And C34 should provide enough filtering for the meter (Digital meters tend to go nuts on unfiltered waveforms).

Is the truck negative or positive ground?

madmike17 10-27-2011 10:08 PM

It is a negative ground. I believe most positive ground cars were imports.

old_coot88 10-27-2011 10:15 PM

All the 6V Chrysler product cars i ever dealt with were positive ground also, though there may well have been exceptions.

madmike17 10-27-2011 10:26 PM

The truck is actually my fathers, and I will check with him tommorow. I am also going to test it tommorow when the battery is charged again. Thanks for the help so far!

dieseljeep 10-27-2011 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old_coot88 (Post 3017180)
All the 6V Chrysler product cars i ever dealt with were positive ground also, though there may well have been exceptions.

6 volt Fords as well.

madmike17 10-28-2011 10:54 PM

Turns out, the truck is positive ground. with the transformer diconnected, I read 307 volts dc to ground. When I reconnected the circuit, the vibrator didnt even run. After a lot of fooling around with it it finally began to run. Unfortunately, the radio does not work. A hum the same frequency as the vibrator came through the speaker, but nothing else. As i turned the tuning cap, there were crackles and pops from the cap itself. It sounded like high voltage arcing between the plates. Should the rotors have hv on them? I know the stator is directly connected to ground. The vibrator really didnt want to start, I had to tap on it and shake it to make it start. I think I am in over my head. Now what?

old_coot88 10-29-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madmike17 (Post 3017262)
Turns out, the truck is positive ground. with the transformer disconnected, I read 307 volts dc to ground.

Now that's with C34 still in-circuit, right? And you're getting 307V positive to ground across C34?
Quote:

When I reconnected the circuit, the vibrator didnt even run.
Sounds like something's shorted out on the B+ line, like maybe filter cap C29. Did you replace it after it 'spilled its guts' from reversed polarity?
Quote:

After a lot of fooling around with it it finally began to run. Unfortunately, the radio does not work. A hum the same frequency as the vibrator came through the speaker, but nothing else. As i turned the tuning cap, there were crackles and pops from the cap itself. It sounded like high voltage arcing between the plates. Should the rotors have hv on them?
The tuning cap shouldn't have any signifigant voltage on it, maybe just a few volts max.
Quote:

I know the stator is directly connected to ground.
Normally the tuning cap rotors are at ground and the stators are the 'hot' side of the cap (unless you've a got a very unusual style of tuning cap).:scratch2:
Quote:

The vibrator really didnt want to start, I had to tap on it and shake it to make it start. I think I am in over my head. Now what?
You might try disconnecting what you did before, leaving just C34 in-circuit, and see if the vib will start up easily. If so, it suggests a heavy short in something 'downstream' (like in C29) lugging the supply down and stalling the vib.

old_coot88 10-29-2011 12:23 PM

Addendum:

BTW, what are you disconnecting? The break should be at either side of L6, the RF choke directly downstream from C34. That'll be a good opportunity to check for a B+ short 'downstream'.

madmike17 10-29-2011 12:31 PM

The 307 volts was positive in relation to ground. It was measured with the .1mfd cap connected to the secondary center tap and nothing else. I did replace the electrolytic that died. I didn't think to check the actual voltage on the tuning cap, but I'm pretty sure it was sparking. I actually found that the rotor was rubbing, so I bent one of the plates over a little. I made a mistake in typing, the rotor is actually connected to ground not the stator. When I disconnected the hv circuit again at said point, I got 267 vdc. This may have been due to the tubes being in and drawing heater current, while last time they were not. Once again I had to tap on the vibrator to get it started.

madmike17 10-29-2011 12:36 PM

Also a side note: do you think there is a place where Ken-Rad ST style tubes can be found? I would like to have them all match the originals. The 6B8G and 6N7G are replacements.

bob91343 10-29-2011 04:46 PM

I assume you have replaced all electrolytic capacitors. If not, do that before any more struggling.

madmike17 10-30-2011 08:53 AM

The only capacitors that havent been replaced are three very small value micas that I couldnt find replacements for.

DavGoodlin 11-25-2011 06:06 PM

Madmike
Those vibrators with mechanical contacts are trouble. There is a place in florida that makes them exact for your unit in a solid state version. I restored a negative ground 53 Chevrolet radio. A total recap was needed also. According to Justradios.com, mica caps rarely go bad.
http://www.radiodaze.com

Dave G


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.