![]() |
Troubles with an old car radio.
The high voltage section of my Truetone (made by Wells-Gardner) C11 car radio is not functioning. you can see on the schematic the area is marked by a dotted line. The transformer ohms out ok, but it is still not putting our any voltage at all. Vibrator is clearly vibrating, after being opened up and loosened up after many years of no use. I am not sure if the transformer is bad, or if the vibrator points are not conducting properly. Any ideas? It has been completely recapped, btw. Schematic: http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByM...0/M0023530.pdf
|
Also, he vibrator currently installed is a radiart 5400. This may or may not even be the correct vibrator. I noticed one pin was cut off to make it fit the socket.
|
You should see a square wave on the transformer winding. You do have an oscilloscope, right? If not, get one.
It appears to use a self rectifying vibrator. They have a lot of contacts, any of which could not be operating. It also appears that two different vibrators may have been used. There is no indication of vibrator type on the diagram. In a set that old, the buffer capacitor (the one across the secondary of the transformer) may be bad, which places a lot of stress on the contacts. That's the first thing to replace, along with the filter capacitors. |
That's called a synchronous vibrator. A second set of points does the job of rectifying the stepped-up voltage coming out of the transformer.
A radio using a synchronous viber is sensitive to supply voltage polarity. That is, if the radio is negative ground and you reverse the input polarity, the stepped-up voltage will also have reverse polarity. It'll be putting "B-minus" voltage on the filter caps instead of "B plus" voltage. :eek::yikes: |
I wonder if I installed it backwards last time? It ran for about a minute, and faint crackles came through the speaker, but no sound. Then the 10 mfd cap let out its guts. I couldnt find a reason, I just figured it was defective. I also later found out that the audio interstage transformer was bad. If it is just the contacts, would a little filing help? Ill try to find a scope if I can.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The vibrator contacts might still be OK if you didn't run it that way too long. |
It was C29B, and it tested ok despite all the fluids that came out of it on my $20 harbor freight multimeter. The transformer T6 had an open primary, which I used a capacitor to bypass as show on the philco website. I believe the technique was called rc coupling. It seems like it must be a problem with the vibrator contacts. Would filing them be of any help, or would they be damaged?
|
Before attempting any filing, I would see how the vibrator runs with correct polarity. It may be OK.
|
The vibrator can be reversed in the socket for a different polarity Im pretty sure. It will be used with negative ground on a 1947 international pickup.
|
Addendum to earlier post
As a side note, there is a quick and easy way to convert one of these radios to run on reverse polarity. I used to do it with Buick (negative ground) radios for use in Chrysler product (positive ground) cars. All you do is swap the transformer's two HV secondary leads (leaving the center tap alone). And presto, the radio runs fine on reverse supply polarity. Doggone, I never saw one before where the vibrator itself can be reversed. L'arn sumpthin new every day.:D |
Its an 8 pin socket, the vibrator has 4 pins. there is an arrow on the chassis which can point to either a + or - marked on the vibrator. So to be clear: I should connect the pin connecting to the coil to 6 volts and the case to ground. The pulsed DC can be measured with a scope on the two larger pins. Is this what needs to be tested now?
|
Quote:
I always looked at filing points as the last resort. Well son of a gun, upon blowing the schematic up to full size, C34 is actually .10 mfd, not a 10mfd electrolytic as i originally thought. That's why C34 didn't get cooked by reverse polarity and C29 did. |
There is no voltage on either C34 or any part of the secondary. the schematic isnt really making sense to me right now though. It seems that the pin out of the vibrator is viewed from the top, rather than the prong side as it says based on looking at the vibrators actual internal wiring.
|
Hm. Can you hear it buzzing at all with the radio powered up and the tubes lit?
|
Yes, the vibrator clearly runs. The only solution I can think of is to just turn the vibrator around. Could this be damaging if I'm wrong? What if i just disconnected the center tap to see if there is voltage when the vibrator is switched so that nothing could be harmed? Also, voltage off the center tap should be DC, right? It seems that if the vibrator was reversed, the result would be AC coming through because it is not cancelled out.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Is the truck negative or positive ground? |
It is a negative ground. I believe most positive ground cars were imports.
|
All the 6V Chrysler product cars i ever dealt with were positive ground also, though there may well have been exceptions.
|
The truck is actually my fathers, and I will check with him tommorow. I am also going to test it tommorow when the battery is charged again. Thanks for the help so far!
|
Quote:
|
Turns out, the truck is positive ground. with the transformer diconnected, I read 307 volts dc to ground. When I reconnected the circuit, the vibrator didnt even run. After a lot of fooling around with it it finally began to run. Unfortunately, the radio does not work. A hum the same frequency as the vibrator came through the speaker, but nothing else. As i turned the tuning cap, there were crackles and pops from the cap itself. It sounded like high voltage arcing between the plates. Should the rotors have hv on them? I know the stator is directly connected to ground. The vibrator really didnt want to start, I had to tap on it and shake it to make it start. I think I am in over my head. Now what?
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Addendum:
BTW, what are you disconnecting? The break should be at either side of L6, the RF choke directly downstream from C34. That'll be a good opportunity to check for a B+ short 'downstream'. |
The 307 volts was positive in relation to ground. It was measured with the .1mfd cap connected to the secondary center tap and nothing else. I did replace the electrolytic that died. I didn't think to check the actual voltage on the tuning cap, but I'm pretty sure it was sparking. I actually found that the rotor was rubbing, so I bent one of the plates over a little. I made a mistake in typing, the rotor is actually connected to ground not the stator. When I disconnected the hv circuit again at said point, I got 267 vdc. This may have been due to the tubes being in and drawing heater current, while last time they were not. Once again I had to tap on the vibrator to get it started.
|
Also a side note: do you think there is a place where Ken-Rad ST style tubes can be found? I would like to have them all match the originals. The 6B8G and 6N7G are replacements.
|
I assume you have replaced all electrolytic capacitors. If not, do that before any more struggling.
|
The only capacitors that havent been replaced are three very small value micas that I couldnt find replacements for.
|
Madmike
Those vibrators with mechanical contacts are trouble. There is a place in florida that makes them exact for your unit in a solid state version. I restored a negative ground 53 Chevrolet radio. A total recap was needed also. According to Justradios.com, mica caps rarely go bad. http://www.radiodaze.com Dave G |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.