![]() |
NTSC Pennant?
1 Attachment(s)
Does anyone have a nice high-res version of the NTSC pennant? This is a small version of an image that I scanned from an old TV book. There are problems with colors bleeding through from the other side of the page, etc. I have seen the little image at Ed Reitan's website, but that's not what I'm looking for as a screen background.
Phil Nelson |
The only other place I've seen this is on the cover of the Jan 54 IRE Proceedings, and every copy I know of has been loved to death - in much worse condition than what you have. Sorry I can't help - good luck.
|
I wonder if it was ever meant to be used as a televised image. May just have been a print illustration. I suppose one could photoshop the correct hues and make a DVD, but what would be a correct/proper orange?
|
how's this?
Test image: note +/- I bars and +/- Q bars in upper left (Y, I, Q all full bandwidth) http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2465/...3ea58e0d_o.jpg Q turned off (transmitter side, I filtered at to 1.5 Mhz bandwidth): http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2650/...fe8101cf_o.jpg I turned off (transmitter side, Q filtered to 0.5 Mhz bandwidth): http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2774/...36c43d42_o.jpg Encoded and decoded with I/Q demods, subcarrier notch filter in Y channel, shows: cross color in awning; Q smear on green-magenta edge; subcarrier dots on color bar edges. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2704/...d925c47b_o.jpg NOTE: computer simulation was simplified by making the color subcarrier phase coherent with the pixel placement in these images, resulting in the slight aspect ratio distortion seen here. |
Interesting! John
|
Quote:
I think I have seen a recommendation from you for this book, in fact -- Basic Television by Bernard Grob. I have been using this as a computer desktop background and thought someone might happen to have a better version. The scan I made looks kinda fuzzed when blown up to 1440 x 900 resolution. Still jolly, though. Phil |
Quote:
:bash: +I = orange |
Quote:
Pete |
Quote:
Pete |
1 Attachment(s)
Here's an enlarged (and slightly color-corrected) version of the original image that was posted above... it could still be sharpened a bit, if that's your preference.
The size is now 1024 x 599. Hope this is useful... -Kevin |
Cool. How did you do color correction? I'm a dolt when it comes to using Paintshop. I have the original scan (820K !) at http://antiqueradio.org/art/temp/NTSCBackground.jpg .
Phil |
1 Attachment(s)
Wow-- thanks for supplying the original scan, Phil!
I've similarly color corrected the original (as well as did a quick bit of clean-up to even out the lighter blue on the right, and get rid of a few dark spots and image flaws), and reduced it to the same 1024 x 599 size. The reduction route gives much nicer results than blowing up a small image, since the final picture retains a lot of the texture of the original, which my blow-up wouldn't have had, even if it were sharpened. Looks decent enough, I'd say... :) -Kevin |
That's much better. It's already on my desktop. Thanks!
Phil |
2 Attachment(s)
Did a little photoshopping http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...6&d=1256797967
And the digital version as well :D http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...5&d=1256797967 |
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2465/...3ea58e0d_o.jpg
It seems, based on the colors as registered in this JPEG file, that 205° would be the RGB position for -I, 24° for +I, 275° for +Q and 95° for -Q, would that sound correct? (Being that RGB values are different from the phase positions in video language.) I had done my own research of position values in Photoshop and Corel Photo-Paint 11, and had come up with: - 204° for -I - 24° for +I - 272° for +Q - 92° for -Q |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.