View Single Post
  #30  
Old 12-14-2008, 04:32 PM
dtuomi's Avatar
dtuomi dtuomi is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by firenzeprima View Post
Sure, apart from the annoying phase change of images, the icon NTSC if you use red or yellow saturated colors can "colarer" on your TV, mingle with other colors or tremolite even if your TV is fully functional.
I sort of had to figure out your definitions there. Unfortunately, I have to disagree, any television system can develop these faults because they're frequently due to limitations in the broadcast chain or problems within the receiving set itself. NTSC does not inherently have any more difficulty than any other system with saturation problems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceebee23
NTSC is not capable of producing a true RGB signal ...because of the weighting of the I and Q signals but both PAL and SECAM contain the full RGB components BUT of course an NTSC style system for 625/25 could be set up to provide true RGB ....but the phase issue was seen as a major problem...

In fact NTSC has superior transmission characteristics for long distance cable/microwave transmission than either SECAM or PAL.
NTSC has no problems decoding to RGB. There has been over the years some disagreement on implementations of color decoding in NTSC. 3 different revisions if memory serves. The latest one was in the 80's and dealt with modern phosphors on TV sets. Current NTSC broadcast chains should decode correctly for modern TV's.

Quote:
Originally Posted by old_tv_nut
That's an interesting statement. In what way is NTSC superior for long distance cable and microwave? I would think PAL to be superior due to the phase distortions that could accumulate in multiple-stage video links.
It might be a true statement, although I haven't read anything that would confirm or deny it. NTSC does tend to be easier to impliment in closed circuit situations. The signaling is simpler, and some of the timings less critical. Since long distance cables, either copper or fiber optic, use FM modulation to transport the signal its feasible that NTSC might be easier to deal with. And using the FM modulation scheme means there are no phase issues, which is the real reason why PAL was developed to begin with. Still I haven't read anything definitive on if that's true or not.

David

Last edited by dtuomi; 12-14-2008 at 04:33 PM. Reason: Redundent redudencies
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma