|
No sympathy from me, it's clear why it failed in the first place... It's not disrespect, it's the truth.
As I already said, I'm most interested in others not being mislead. He can do whatever he wants to the set, I don't think I'm being disrespectful for saying that. I simply want people to be HONEST with their assessments, that's all. Telling us there's only 128ma on the cathode is misleading, and to the uninformed observer, irresponsible.
Let me illustrate: what's the lowest cathode reading any of you have seen on your sets? Lowest I ever saw was 178ma on my CTC-9, and it took a LOT of tweaking to get there. Most would be happy with 200...
__________________
Evolution...
|