[tubesrule]

Hi Terry,

Originally Posted by Penthode

I certainly see your points. But the issue at the time was for CPA to optimize luma and chroma resolution. For one to first hand understand whether the abandonment CPA was justified requires a signal with at least the chroma resolution the early NTSC was trying to achieve. CPA was initially intended to convery full bandwidth chroma for both color differ signals of 1.5 MHz. NTSC constricted the Q channel to 500kHz. Secondly the use of a four line adaptive decoder compromises the diagonal luma resolution as well as reducing the vertical chroma resolution. In other words concatenating the two codecs will not give a proper representation of CPA. However, this will only be worth the bother if the display CRT focus and bandwidth to the CRT are up to the job of showing the extra resolution that was intended by the use of CPA.

I also believe the thought of the NTSC at the time was if putting the subcarrier at 3.89MHz, would the subcarrier into luma interference pattern less obvious and allow the luma bandwidth to be somewhat greater? The IQ NTSC standard with the subcarrier at 3.58MHz meant that the luma trap limited luma bandwidth to only about 3.0MHz and with the subcarrier at 3.89MHz, the luma response was effectively extended another 400kHz

All valid points. To see CPA as it was originally envisioned would take higher chroma bandwidth than available with I/Q NTSC. This has also been brought up with the converters when displaying to a CBS sequential set which is one of the reasons I added the component inputs to the WC converter. As Nick pointed out however, it takes a trained eye to see any difference on the few CBS sets when using a composite versus component input.

Keep in mind that we are not using a strict NTSC signal as a video source. When coming from a set top box, DVD, DVR, basically any digitally sourced device, the video encoder is probably not doing Q limiting per the spec. This along with the fact that the source is clean and we are connecting directly to the set, many other limiting factors have been eliminated or greatly reduced.

Originally Posted by Penthode

Component video from a DVD player will have reasonable stable sync. I agree that locking the subcarrier to the sync will be a challenge. VHS tape as a source will be totally out of the question since VHS does not fulfil the mathematical subcarrier to Hsync relationship and VHS simply does not have the bandwidth. DVD playback does and is stable.

This is why I prefer digital solutions. The WC converter has a built in 8 frame memory that acts a TBC, so regardless of the source, the output will always be stable and correct. While that is not as important in this application, it makes a world of difference for the CBS sets. Once you get those wheels up to speed and in sync, you don't want the sync phase changing

Originally Posted by Penthode

I would think the reason I would persue CPA encoder without the IQ concatenation would be to see how well CPA would work. I think we would all agree that component 525 video looks very decent. (In fact playback of a good quality component DVD authored from 35mm film looks better than much (if not most) broadcast video purported to be HD).

Whenever a new format comes up, I always add it to all my converters, so since it will also be in the WC converter, we would be able to compare the effect of the different inputs.

For an input source on any of these comparisons we really should be using 10bit uncompressed video, or at least a minimally compressed one like DigiBeta. While DVD's can look good, as a design engineer the 8 bit quantization and mpeg2 compression are horrendous as evidenced in fast motion and quantization noise in dark scenes.

Great discussion Terry. I guess we need to see what Nick discovers as he documents the set.

Nick, it's disappointing to hear the set does not have the CPA switch and may be too far modified from it's origins to put it back.

Darryl