View Single Post
  #22  
Old 11-08-2013, 06:56 PM
earlyfilm's Avatar
earlyfilm earlyfilm is offline
Eternal Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Culpeper, VA
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electronic M View Post
I gotcha. . . . . from owning a Zenith porthole . . . .
Electronic M,

Thanks! I stand corrected!

I am not familiar with the early Zeniths, as the town where I lived and worked, until I quit Radio/TV service in 1960, had no Zenith dealership until the mid-1950's. So I pulled up pictures of these chassis and hit this on the second try.

http://www.earlytelevision.org/pdf/Z...237-Riders.pdf

(Zenith chassis 22H20/23H22/24H20-21 in Riders Vol 8, Zenith page 6-8 left side)

If one looks at Figure 9 between pages 6-7 and 6-8 you will see a late 1940's Zenith chassis with a wired remote control sitting on top of a huge barrel tuner.

This is what I mistook for a dynamotor. An apparent shadow made it look like a separate chassis.

That is the beauty of this site. If someone royally puts his foot in his mouth, as I just did, someone will quickly correct him.

Since the Zenith's transformer is still in place, we must assume that he uses some source of AC, which in this home-made conversion probably would be a war-surplus dynamotor.

The smallest version of this set pulls 225 watts at 117 V AC.

I = P/E or 225 watts / 6 volts = 37.5 amps assuming that the dynamotor conversion was 100% efficient.

From memory, dynamotors were only between 60 & 70% efficient. On a quick search, I could not confirm this figure as these things are so obsolete.

Assuming 70% efficiency, the battery drain would be 54 amps!

In any case, this set would be a battery killer in a 6 volt car, and this illustrates some of the design choices in the Delco proof-of-concept set!

James.
Reply With Quote