Quote:
Originally Posted by etype2
"So this may be interesting. Do they actually make a better picture in any kind of way than later sets, or is it all nostalgia? Maybe simply the love and interest in vintage tube type electronics as a lost science as is a bit of the case with me as well. Waddaya think?
______________"
That was the last part of his question. IMHO, in terms of ultimate picture quality, flat panels are superior to roundies. Yes, LCD flat panels had problems, but most of those problems have been eliminated. With my calibrated Sharp Quatron which has 25% more pixels than a regular LCD, I can't see the pixels unless I put my eyes on top of the screen. I see no scan lines. I get a 16x9 screen format which means I can see 100% of the image content with pixel by pixel image mapping. I get HD and now 4K resolution, not to mention the theater like experience from a 70 inch widescreen. I plan on going larger with the next set. For me, those advantages out weigh the nostalgia of the roundie, but I still like the roundies for the memories of my first color experiences in the 50's and my first color set in 1966.
|
I don't understand all the hype about HD, Ultra HD etc. In computer monitors where I'm positioned close to the device and need to read small text, yes. In smartphones where I need to be able to view content clearly on a tiny screen, yes. On televisions where I'm sitting metres away, not really. I've always thought that if you have a problem with the resolution of your television, you're probably sitting too close.
Even with glasses, I can't see any difference between a SD television and a "Super Mega Ultra HD++" television from a good viewing distance, certainly not enough of a difference to make me dump my reliable old 80's Samsung and run out to buy one.
The only problems I've ever had were trying to read sports scores on a tiny 14" portable, which has since taken place in the attic.
Just my two cents.