Zenith C725 AM/FM radio

[Adam]

A 1959 model (there was even a date stamped on the top of the chassis 04 16 59), this radio actually worked fine when I got it. But I like to recap something this old, so I recapped it and replaced the selenium rectifier with a 1N4007. I like the unusual light green color of the cabinet...

[jr_tech]

Nice color and style! Couple of questions... is there actually a farly large oval speaker behind the grill and does the cat get on?

jr

[Adam]

It is an oval speaker, but it I think it was only a 4x6… And I don't think Fluffy would fit on top of that radio! The smallest of my 3 cats, Moppet, might…

Strangely, I have a similar AM-only Zenith (a 1957 model), and I think I remember it using a bigger speaker, like a 6x9. The real king of Zenith table radios from this era is the AM/FM C845, with it's separate woofer and tweeter. The C725 is equally as sensitive C845 on both bands, and I think better looking, but the C845 has the nicer sound.

[dieseljeep]

Originally Posted by Adam

It is an oval speaker, but it I think it was only a 4x6… And I don't think Fluffy would fit on top of that radio! The smallest of my 3 cats, Moppet, might…

Strangely, I have a similar AM-only Zenith (a 1957 model), and I think I remember it using a bigger speaker, like a 6x9. The real king of Zenith table radios from this era is the AM/FM C845, with it's separate woofer and tweeter. The C725 is equally as sensitive C845 on both bands, and I think better looking, but the C845 has the nicer sound.

I had a Zenith radio from around 1956, that had a 6X9 speaker and a PC board chassis. Very unusual for a 5 tube chassis.

[Jeffhs]

I agree with Adam. I have a Zenith C-845,identical to the one in my avatar, in the "toasted mahogany" (blonde) cabinet and like it; great sound, sensitive as anything (mine will get stations from southwestern Ontario, Canada, Detroit, Toledo, Youngstown, Ohio and Erie, Pennsylvania, as well as the locals from Cleveland, simply using the line cord antenna and under favorable band conditions; the set still has its original tubes and everything else--I haven't done a thing to it since I got it seven or eight years ago, and it still sounds great). Today's gutless-wonder one-chip "stereo" radios cannot possibly match the C-845 for the qualities I mentioned. That is almost certainly why the C-845 is, as Adam put it, the king of AM-FM table radios of the late '50s and early sixties. The same goes for this radio's variants, the C-845M, -L, and the H845 series; the only differences between any of those radios are in the cabinet style, as they all use the same basic chassis (8C01 or 8C02).

BTW, I put the word "stereo" in the last paragraph in quotes because today's portable radios claiming to have stereo FM give the medium a very bad name. The stereo separation, for one thing, is a joke in most stereo portables. I have a Panasonic AM/FM/stereo-FM boombox that is perhaps a foot long; it sounds good, but the speakers are still far too close to each other for the best stereo effect. I don't use that radio much, but if I do from now on, it will be with headphones.

My Zenith H-480 AM/FM/FM-stereo clock radio has the same problem, but that radio hasn't worked very well on FM in perhaps ten years or more since I tried to clean the slide pots for volume, tone and balance. The cleaning spray must have shorted something out (I'm darned if I know what shorted), as the radio does work after a fashion (in mono) on FM, but the volume must be at maximum to hear anything; even then, the sound is extremely weak. AM works perfectly, with more sound volume than I know what to do with.

[jr_tech]

Originally Posted by Jeffhs

BTW, I put the word "stereo" in the last paragraph in quotes because today's portable radios claiming to have stereo FM give the medium a very bad name. The stereo separation, for one thing, is a joke in most stereo portables. I have a Panasonic AM/FM/stereo-FM boombox that is perhaps a foot long; it sounds good, but the speakers are still far too close to each other for the best stereo effect. I don't use that radio much, but if I do from now on, it will be with headphones

The critical thing here is listening distance relative to the speaker spacing... this little Sangean, which has about 8" speaker spacing, placed on my desk where I am working 2 to 3 feet away, produces a quite pleasing stereo image. I would not recommend it as a room-filling stereo, but for close listening, it is quite nice.

http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...alty/0068.html

By the way, it is a HOT radio for FM dx, that far outperforms (in sensitivity and selectivity) every vintage Zenith that I have ever owned, including a TO 3000 and Y-832

jr

[Jeffhs]

Originally Posted by jr_tech

The critical thing here is listening distance relative to the speaker spacing... this little Sangean, which has about 8" speaker spacing, placed on my desk where I am working 2 to 3 feet away, produces a quite pleasing stereo image. I would not recommend it as a room-filling stereo, but for close listening, it is quite nice.

http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...alty/0068.html

By the way, it is a HOT radio for FM dx, that far outperforms (in sensitivity and selectivity) every vintage Zenith that I have ever owned, including a TO 3000 and Y-832

jr

Your hearing is probably normal in both ears. I am almost deaf in my right ear so I cannot hear stereo properly, on my stereo system or on the stereo (!) audio system of my flat-screen TV. This means stereo is all but useless to me.

As to FM DX, you are probably surrounded by mountains. The only "FM DX" you probably get is within the state you live in, unless you have an FM antenna mounted ridiculously high.

Here in northeastern Ohio, I have yet to hear any FM stations from California or anywhere hundreds of miles away. The best "FM DX" I have ever had was in the summer of 1970, when a local FM station was knocked off the air in a thunderstorm. The station I heard while the local one was silent was in West Palm Beach, Florida on 107.9 MHz. I had a cheap stereo FM portable radio at the time with a telescoping antenna, nothing more. Once the local station was back on the air I never again heard that station, or any other FM stations from Florida--or anyplace else hundreds of miles south, east or west of where I live.

The only FM DX I get here, as a rule, is from Detroit, southwestern Ontario, Canada, Erie, Pennsylvania and Youngstown, Ohio. I am within one mile of the south shore of Lake Erie, so I can get the Detroit stations, as well as the others I mentioned, quite well in the summer on any of my Zenith radios.

How can a radio such as your "Sangean" portable be better from an FM selectivity and sensitivity standpoint than any 50+-year-old Zenith radio? Your set must have an FM section hotter than a firecracker if it can outperform most older tube-powered radios.

Most of today's FM radios are nowhere near that sensitive or selective. The digital FM tuner in my bookshelf stereo system, for example, is almost useless in my area, which is about 40 miles from Cleveland's FM stations. I am sure it would work well in the Cleveland suburb I moved here from 16 years ago, but in a semi-fringe area such as the small east-central Lake County, Ohio town I live in today, it doesn't work well at all. I cannot listen to the local NPR station, for example, when my computer is on due to the CPU hash, and stereo FM reception is iffy at best on some stations; therefore, I listen mostly to my own CDs, cassettes and audio files stored on my computer for music, having almost completely abandoned FM radio.

I realize a better antenna would solve the reception problems I have here, but since I live in an apartment building with lease restrictions forbidding outdoor television or FM antennas (every tenant in this building, including myself, has cable or satellite for TV and probably uses short indoor antennas for FM, no antennas), such antennas are out of the question.

[TUD1]

I have this exact radio, and I like it a lot. I remember one time, I was listening to it, and all of a sudden, it quit. Thankfully, it was only a tube filament.