Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early B&W and Projection TV

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-31-2007, 08:10 PM
Steve McVoy's Avatar
Steve McVoy Steve McVoy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,606
Prewar Radios with "TV Sound" on the SW band

A recent thread at rec.antiques.radio+phono:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...a7aa08a09859bd

uncovered that some radios made in 1940 had the notation "TV Sound" on the tuning dial on the shortwave band at just above 8 mHz. Philco made a "television converter" in 1940 which broadcast the audio IF (8.25 mHz) to a nearby radio receiver, thus eliminating the need for an audio detector, amplifier, and output tube:

http://www.earlytelevision.org/philc...html#converter

The notations have been discovered on Sears/Silvertone models 6436 and 6490. Probably 1940 model Philco radios have similar notations.

If you have a radio with TV Sound on the SW band, please post it here. I'd like to see how many manufacturers did this.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-31-2007, 10:52 PM
polaraman's Avatar
polaraman polaraman is offline
<--1956 300B
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cayce , South Carolina
Posts: 1,063
My 1939 RCA T63 says "designed for television attachment." I do not see Tv sound on the SW scale. What is AM'T'R?

I can also add that our current military 2 way communication radios can pick up TV audio. Comes in handy while in the field and the World Series is going on.


polaraman
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Picture 054.jpg (60.3 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg Picture 052.jpg (60.0 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg Picture 053.jpg (59.2 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg Picture 055.jpg (61.8 KB, 31 views)
__________________
On the Bench: Master's Degree Thesis!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2007, 12:26 AM
ChrisW6ATV's Avatar
ChrisW6ATV ChrisW6ATV is offline
Another CT-100 lives!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hayward, Cal. USA
Posts: 3,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by polaraman View Post
What is AM'T'R?

polaraman
Probably refers to Amateur ("ham") Radio. The frequency bands would be perhaps 1.8-2, 3.5-4, 7-7.3, 14-14.35 and 28-30 MHz depending on the coverage of your shortwave receiver.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2007, 02:00 AM
Adam's Avatar
Adam Adam is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,383
The SW dial on this Philco radio only goes up to 3.3MHz, but there's a sticker on the back that says " BUILT TO RECEIVE TELEVISION SOUND - The Wireless Way - when used with Philco Television Picture Receiver, without Wires, Plug in, or Connections of any kind "

Last edited by Adam; 09-13-2009 at 10:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2007, 04:24 AM
Jukin Jay's Avatar
Jukin Jay Jukin Jay is offline
Geek
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 19
From this thread it seems as if there were three separate schemes. The RCA radio had an RCA plug (so named...) for a wired audio connection. These also worked with their cute 45-RPM record changers.

It sounds as if the Philco was intended to be used with Philco TVs that probably were intended to include a low-power transmitter in or near the broadcast band.

The 8.5 MHz sound IF pickup sounds implausible. Even in the early TV days the sound was FM, and the AM/SW radios were AM. Also the TV IF strip would need to be very well shielded to avoid oscillation if it was intended to radiate far enough to be heard on a nearby radio.

I think that the claim of "Ready for TV" on radios of that vintage was more marketing than technology. Television was in its infancy, an expensive novelty. Manufacturers could sell more radios if the consumer had a notion that a "simple adapter" soon to be available would allow them to get video on their brand new radio.

On the other hand I think I read here of a limited number of very early televisions produced without an audio output stage or speaker. These were indeed intended for use with the amplifier and speaker of a companion radio. The RCA scheme makes the most sense to me, much like the "AUX" jacks on 1970s stereo receivers are happy with CD players and IPods that didn't exist at the time the receivers were produced.

Did Philco ever manufacture a TV set sans audio stage that coupled to their radio "The Wireless Way"?
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 08-01-2007, 07:57 AM
Steve McVoy's Avatar
Steve McVoy Steve McVoy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,606
There were only two ways of using radios for TV audio that I'm aware of. First, and most common, RCA and GE bottom of the line 1939 and 1940 sets (TT-5 and HM-171) had an audio detector and a jack on the back to connect them to the TV inputs (RCA jacks) provided on a number of prewar radios.

The second was the one used by Philco in their 1940 7 inch TV set, which had a low power 8.25 mHz transmitter. TV until 1941 had AM sound, so a standard SW radio tuned to 8.25 mHz would receive the sound from the TV set. Silvertone had a mark at 8.25 mHz on their SW dials.

Here is the Philco TV set that used that appproach:

http://www.earlytelevision.org/philc...html#converter

I just learned that RCA produced a prototype 5 inch receiver, the RR-355, which used the 8.25 mHz approach. A few of these were made for the 1939 World's Fair, but none were ever sold to the public.

Silvertone, and probably other manufacturers, included a marking on the SW dial at 8.25 mHz for this system. This approach would not have worked very well, since any drift in the TV local oscillator would have moved the IF frequency, and therefore the SW radio would have to be retuned.

I know of no TV set that used a low power AM band transmitter for the sound.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2007, 08:12 AM
tubesrule's Avatar
tubesrule tubesrule is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 331
The RCA set was the RR-366 prototype from 1937. It used an 8.75MHz IF that was broadcast to a nearby radio. There were only three of these sets made.

Attached is a page from the manual for the set.

Darryl
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img001.jpg (63.4 KB, 35 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-01-2007, 08:19 AM
Steve McVoy's Avatar
Steve McVoy Steve McVoy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,606
Thanks, Darryl, for correcting my information on the RCA set.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:35 PM
Steve McVoy's Avatar
Steve McVoy Steve McVoy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,606
I've posted a page with more information on TV sound, along with a technical manual for the RCA RR-366.

http://www.earlytelevision.org/wireless_tv_sound.html

http://www.earlytelevision.org/rca_rr366_manual.html
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-09-2007, 06:15 PM
similost's Avatar
similost similost is offline
Rockin and Rollin....
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Alexandria VA
Posts: 223
Here's a page from the manual that came with my 1940 (built in 39) Zenith console.

While it's not "wireless" nor meant to recieve on SW, they must have seen TV sound needing to be output to something to be heard would be my guess...


anyway, here's the manual page. It's an 8s563

__________________
Big ass speakers with too much power, and nowhere to go fast...
Altec A7-500; Peavey SUB118-HC
Modded Quicksilver 8417 Mono Amps; Tapco J1400
Behringer MX2004X; Tapco T-231; Peavey VSX; Pioneer SR-303
Technics SL-1200MKII; Pioneer RT-701; Yamaha CDX-1030; KLH Model 18
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #11  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:12 PM
wa2ise's Avatar
wa2ise wa2ise is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,147
Post

TV sound was orginally to be AM. But just after WW2 the FCC decided to bump up the scan rate from 441i to 525i, and make the sound FM. Which annoyed David Sarnoff of RCA no end, as that would require RCA to pay licensing to Armstrong, the guy who invented/developed FM. But the FCC was correct in mandating FM sound for TV, AM would have sounded like crap, with much interference from the video sidebands of the TV signal.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-09-2007, 11:12 PM
Steve McVoy's Avatar
Steve McVoy Steve McVoy is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,606
FM allowed intercarrier sound, which would have been impossible with AM. AM would have sounded fine as long as separate IF sections were used.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.