Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Antique Radio

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 08-28-2021, 10:57 AM
vortalexfan vortalexfan is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_coot88 View Post
Bridging simply means "connect in parallel with", using a pair of clip leads. So bridge (jumper) each individual electrolytic (one at a time) with a single unit of equivalent or higher ratings. Note correct polarity.

The caps in question would be C19 and C20 (main power supply filters). You could jumper each with something like a 20mf 450V unit and see if it affects the hum.

EDIT. Those two caps should be replaced as a matter of course anyway. If they're the original cans they could be left in place for aesthetics, but out of circuit. There's also C26, a low voltage electrolytic across the cathode resistor of the 6F6. It won't cause a hum problem, but will cause reduced volume if it's gone open. It should be replaced anyway.
Its already been done, none of the electrolytics in the radio are original to the set, that was the first thing I did when I got this set, was replace the old electrolytics, which I left the old cans in place for aesthetics and wired in some new electrolytics which I installed onto some isolated terminal strips that I soldered ontop of the old electrolytic can's positive terminal (the terminal strip's attachment lug was isolated from the terminals so the original cans are still out of the circuit but are being used as an attachment point for the terminal strip for the new electrolytics without affecting the circuit, its a trick I learned from Mr. Carlson's Lab.)

I checked the capacitors that I installed in the radio and they still test good yet on my ESR Meter, (they mesured about 4-6 ohms ESR and they both are 2 4.7 MFD 450V axial lead electrolytics paralleled together to make 10 MFD at 450V).

And then the low voltage electrolytic is a 10/10 @ 160V Firecracker type electrolytic cap like the original was, and that one tests fine as well.

So unless one of these caps failed in a manner I'm not aware of, or that the ESR meter wasn't able to detect (dead shorted) then I don't think the electrolytics are to blame here.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.