Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Flat Panels & Digital Format

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old 11-29-2011, 06:57 PM
Jeffhs's Avatar
Jeffhs Jeffhs is offline
<----Zenith C845
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fairport Harbor, Ohio (near Lake Erie)
Posts: 4,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisW6ATV View Post
Yes indeed! I keep a running total of the money saved since I cancelled satellite TV in late 2005; it is up to about US$5,900.00 so far.
How are you getting TV reception today if you cancelled your satellite service? (Just curious.) My best guess would be that you either went to cable or to AT&T U-Verse, or even to an OTA antenna.

In response to Vintagecollect's remarks regarding being in the "right" area for good OTA DTV reception: Yes, that is still a major problem with DTV, and is the reason most people today have either cable, satellite, or (if available) AT&T U-Verse service -- OTA reception of digital television signals in most areas is just too iffy. Even if you are within line-of-sight range of your area's TV transmitters, the problem would not be signal strength but reflections, causing dead spots and hot spots in different areas of your house; this can even cause problems with the proper aiming of outdoor TV antennas. As a somewhat extreme example of what I am referring to: I live in a semi-fringe area for Cleveland television, the transmitters for the seven stations serving northeast Ohio being just under 40 miles from my apartment. I was getting fair to poor reception of most stations using rabbit ears (and no reception whatsoever from NBC channel 3 in Cleveland) -- no outdoor TV antennas permitted here -- before the DTV transition. I have not tried antenna reception of the Cleveland stations since the DTV switch, however, so I don't know what my DTV reception would be like. Since NTSC analog reception here was fair to poor, I wouldn't expect much better results with digital; the one channel I was missing in analog probably doesn't reach here in ATSC DTV either, and the reception of all other Cleveland stations would very likely be hit-or-miss as well. Channel 5, the ABC affiliate in Cleveland, was talking about increasing its antenna height and/or increasing transmitter power shortly after the transition, but I don't know if they ever went through with it. Channel 19 is the CBS affiliate for this area; they did increase transmitter power several months ago, in response to complaints that their DTV signal was not reaching the west side of Cleveland and the suburbs of the city located there.

Whether this problem was corrected when the station increased power output, however, I don't know. I think they would have had better results if they would have increased their antenna height, rather than the transmitter output power. I am an amateur radio operator and learned that lesson very early on; the higher your transmitting antenna, the further your transmitted signal will go, even if you are transmitting with just a few watts of power.
__________________
Jeff, WB8NHV

Collecting, restoring and enjoying vintage Zenith radios since 2002

Zenith. Gone, but not forgotten.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.