Do "roundie" color sets make a better picture than later sets?

[dtvmcdonald]

Originally Posted by etype2

I looked at the three sets of two images on that thread. If I understand correctly, the photos on the left are from the CT-100 and the clearer photos on the right are from the Sony LCD? Or am I wrong?
.

You are wrong.
The clearer photos are photos made with a Canon 7D camera. They
have not been through video. The comparison is beween the original
and images of the CT100. As I said, the CT100s are adjusted so that
when I am looking at the photos of the CT100 on the same Dell monitor,
the images on the monitor look exactly like the CT100. Thus,
the comparison on YOUR computer is also exactly the same difference
between the original and the CT100.

I post images of the same Dorothy scene. These are made with the same camera. This is a dvd, not a Blu-ray. It is output as NTSC and
modulated on a B-T agile modulator. Both sets look at NTSC
true VSB, cut off at 4.2 MHz an -1.25 MHz.

The sharp one is my Sony Bravia 45 inch LCD and the other two
are the CT100. The camera and processing was set for
no sharpening, no noise reduction, no contrast enhancement,
and 5250K. The camera was defocused to smear out the dot structure.
They were 1/6 second exposures, the f-number was set to compensate for
brightness difference. One CT100 image was changed
in one way: the color temp slider in Photoshop was moved to 4850K.
This makes it look bluer. This is probably a better representation of a by eye comparison; apparently the camera, set for non-auto color temp, is being fooled by phosphor differences.

http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...1&d=1428624485

http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...1&d=1428624485

http://www.videokarma.org/attachment...1&d=1428624485