Prototype set is here

[Eric H]

Originally Posted by miniman82

The numbers on the horizontal transformer are T-6942 and vertical is 208T9 and 274113.

I believe that last number is a Mfg and Date code, RCA built (274) and 113 would be the 13th week of 1951.
The transformer in your last picture has a 274125 number or mid 1951.

Are these off the shelf RCA parts or were they made specifically for the Prototype?

[miniman82]

Originally Posted by Eric H

The transformer in your last picture has a 274125 number or mid 1951.

That one is actually a power choke, and it does have an RCA stamp on it.

[John Folsom]

Nick, I am comforted by your discovery of convergence transformers. :-) BTW, that schematic is from a RCA CRT symposium, not a set I have.

I may be wrong (I often ma) about the mu-metal shield. The C73293 CRTs are shown to have an internal mu-metal shield. I don't have and explicit data on the C73547 CRTs, but the one in my Sparton also has a external mu-metal shield, so this would seem to indicate the C73547 series tubes use an external shield. Attached is an assembly drawing of the C73293 series tube.

[Penthode]

I have been reading some interesting IEEE articles on early CPA. An especially interesting one is by Bernard Loughlin who worked for Hazeltine Labs in the early 50's. He presented a paper at the Seventh Chicago Spring conference on Broadcast and Television receivers in Chicago in 1966 on the PAL TV system. He makes reference to the early CPA and he puts CPA in the context of what later transpired with the evolution of world standards.

CPA or color phase alternation appears to have originated to help offset the problem of limited bandwidth of the RMA US TV channel eg 6MHz. It is interesting to think that 6MHz is still with us for the ATSC system. But it seems that by the early 50's, after the constant luminance with restricted bandwidth chroma channels has been accepted that somehow interleaving the chroma with he luma as cleanly as possible was the ultimate challenge.

The original NTSC CPA approach was to vestigially modulate B-Y and R-Y with a subcarrier of 3.89 MHz and phase alternate B-Y at either field rate or line rate. (Europe ultimately chose alternating R-Y at line rate). The vestigial sideband approach was to extend the chroma bandwidth and the B-Y alternation would minimize quadrature crosstalk between R-Y and B-Y.

It appears of the two options, the 1952 field test used field alternation rather than line alternation. Is this correct? Slight phase errors would introduce flicker on image edges or chroma transitions due to the crosstalk not being properly integrated or cancelled. It appears that in 1952, a one line delay line was impractically expensive for consumer use and so the true benefit of CPA Phase Alternate Line had to wait a decade and a half.

It appears that the failure of the 1952 CPA test was due to color subcarrier to sound carrier beats (600kHz) and vestigial sideband quadrature crosstalk. Lowering the subcarrier to 3.58MHz and the IQ working overcame the most of the problems.

With regards to the prototype, it appears that if it is indeed still configured for 1952 field CPA, the conversion to IQ NTSC should be relatively straight forward. The crystal frequency of 3.89MHz should indicate whether it is remains the CPA prototype. Chroma demodulation would be restricted to equal band R-Y/ B-Y demodulation since there is no bandwidth differentiation between I and Q in the original CPA prototype. That is, unless it was later further modified.

[old_tv_nut]

Originally Posted by Penthode

I
It appears of the two options, the 1952 field test used field alternation rather than line alternation. Is this correct? Slight phase errors would introduce flicker on image edges or chroma transitions due to the crosstalk not being properly integrated or cancelled.

Yes, field alternation was used. Wentworth's book on color television engineering states that flicker was bad due to difficulty of maintaining the exact relationship between the alternate phases in transmitter and receiver. The air-core coil that Nick found looks suspiciously like it was built to reduce variations with temperature, spacing to the shield can, etc., etc., but we won't know until we discover whether there is a phase switching circuit.

Also, the crystal appears to be missing, so we don't have that confirmation.

[miniman82]

Originally Posted by John Folsom

Nick, I am comforted by your discovery of convergence transformers. :-) BTW, that schematic is from a RCA CRT symposium, not a set I have.

D'oh! Sorry about that, I've been pretty hasty about reading these last couple days. There was some bad weather that came through recently, and it knocked out my internet connection. Because of that, I've had to use spare time at work to post. Now that I have my internet back though, I'm free to post at will. Muhahahaha!