![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Quote:
SC is not RCA and being 21", it's certainly a square set that would require extensive mods. Not a good choice, the whole front panel would have to be fabricated from scratch. Plus, I find the Chinese cabinets repulsive. This set was home grown in the USA, I'd like to keep it looking like it was. Quote:
What the hell do you know about what I paid for this set? Bill with all due respect you have no place to tell me what's high or low here, or make speculations on what's fair. I know what I paid and believe me, selling it at $250 would be taking a loss. To want to save this is one thing, but then to come in here and tell me what's fair is a little beyond me. You'll just have to find another one. Quote:
Then I respectfully suggest that you keep watching Ebay and CL as I did and find your own, or wait and see if I don't end up needing this one. Bantering back and forth with me on this is pointless, until I make my decision. Quote:
Quote:
I'm not interested in spending more money on a cabinet I may or may not use, wait and see what I decide. If I don't need the 168, you can PM me and we'll haggle. Quote:
Who is upset? I will choose what I choose, it's my decision. If I don't end up with the 168, it will be in the classifieds. Again, I don't much care what B&W set this used to be. There were far more TC sets made than field test sets, I have no reservations about using this cabinet. I could see if it was a 621 or something, but as far as I'm concerned it's no different than any other 50's 16" set. Kevin: There are no mounting tabs on the chassis, but that doesn't mean it wasn't in a cabinet. Again, we don't know what RCA did to the other prototypes. Maybe none of them had tabs.
__________________
Evolution... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|