![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is a beautiful set and a nice screen size. Someone should restore that even though it needs a picture tube. RCA sets of that era are very high quality.
__________________
Just look at those channels whiz on by. - Fred Sanford |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calling Bill Cahill, Bill Cahill! Front and Center!
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The weak spot in all early RCA's was that lousy metal CRT.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Posting has been deleted. Hopefully it found a good home and not dragged to the local dump....
__________________
"IPC 610 Class E & J STD-001 Certified" |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I avoid any sets with metal cone CRTs. When I bought my 1952 RCA Kendall console which is still awaiting restoration, I made very sure that the 17" tube was a glass one. If I ever get to restoring it that set will become a daily driver.
__________________
Just look at those channels whiz on by. - Fred Sanford |
| Audiokarma |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a pretty nice 1947 8T-243 tabletop with a good 10BP4 if any RCA fans are interested. A few years ago I had audio and a crisp raster with the horizontal freq. way off. I had to jump in power supply electrolytics in order to keep from flaming rectifier tubes. I ended up restoring a 1950 ish TC-127 and lost interest in the 243. Guess I am an oddball because frankly I think 50s sets are much better looking and interesting than 40s jobs.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|