Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early B&W and Projection TV

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2014, 10:19 AM
CaryLee's Avatar
CaryLee CaryLee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 108
Yesterday was a marathon recap day! I'm not a very fast solderer, I have big hands, a 30 watt iron, and can't friggin' see close up through my glasses anymore (I'm resisting bifocals). And some of those caps are in VERY tight spots, particularly the two that were in the metal box in one corner of the chassis..it took forever to finagle those out and then in again.

I still have the HV section to tackle today, but I feel I'm on the downhill side!

Here's a couple noteworthy events:

The parts list in the SAMS photofact appear fairly accurate. In general, in replacing the paper caps, I ordered one or two spares of each, in case I screwed up and ruined some, and that's about what I ended up with. EXCEPT the .05 value. I ordered 11 of them, and I'm pretty sure I ordered at least two spares and maybe three, because it uses far more of them than anything else..and I only have ONE spare left.

I will say this: I didn't take into account the productions changes bulletin when I ordered caps, primarily because I didn't think of it until after the order was placed, so that could account for coming up "short"...glad I ordered extras!

There are a couple other values that I have extra leftovers of, and that might coincide with the "shortage" of .05's.

MOST notable is that I came up one short on 10uf 25 volt electrolytics. There is only one listed on the parts list (I didn't order any spare electrolytics, primarily because of expense, and not being familiar enough to know what I might use in the future, and I might lose them down the road anyway...you should see my shed..I figured they're a tad more durable with their aluminum housings, too) Turned out there's one in the "main chassis", and there there's another one "hidden" inside the aforementioned metal box in one corner of the chassis. The SAMS photofacts photos show it there, with the cover off the box, but there is nothing at all denoting it's existence. None of the usual arrows corresponding to SAMS location numbers point to it. Seems it was missed somehow. I didn't find it in the production changes bulletin either. Luckily it's a value that our local Radio Shack appears to stock, for a couple bucks, so I'll go get one today and get it in there.

Evidence of prior replacement caps: In one case, location C2 on the SAMS, calls for a 50uf 150 volt electrolytic. What was actually there was a 16uf 150. It's listed as a "filter". Don't know the result of such a change, but it's back to the value as listed in SAMS. I'm sure it was an early replacement, as it was soldered to a cut "pigtail".

There was also a couple older plastic caps in there. A HUGE Mallory .5 "Plascap" and a plastic Sprague.

Pretty much every old paper wax coated caps was "gooey". I saw in a previous write up by someone that they had to get the residue off their hands with Boraxo. I keep Boraxo around too! Works wonders!

I did not "restuff" any of the old cardboard or aluminum caps, but did leave them in place for aesthetics. Frankly, I'm not completely confident in my abilities, I've never worked with multiple can caps before, and figured if something goes haywire in the power up, I wanted to be able to see, smell, and hear what was going on...and having everything out in the open will make replacement in that case easier.

Here's a photo of what appears to me to be a couple of obvious failures:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dumontblowncaps.jpg (34.3 KB, 34 views)

Last edited by CaryLee; 01-26-2014 at 10:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2014, 10:43 AM
ggregg's Avatar
ggregg ggregg is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 702
Been my experience that some of the worst looking caps still work. You just never know.

You didn't leave the old caps in circuit, did you?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2014, 11:00 AM
CaryLee's Avatar
CaryLee CaryLee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggregg View Post
Been my experience that some of the worst looking caps still work. You just never know.

You didn't leave the old caps in circuit, did you?
No. I cut them out and replaced them all, except for the one electrolytic I came up short on..I soldered it back in as a "placeholder" until I can get a new one today.

I did leave the aluminum cans in place, so I assume their "grounds" are still attached to the chassis. (Except for one that is attached to an insulating board which seems to have a separate ground as part of another circuit, C6 in the SAMS: Decoupling and Vert. Amp. Cathode, so it's ground is still connected to it's circuit) But the positive leads were cut loose and soldered to the positive leads of the new electrolytics.

Would there by any problems associated with that? Should I "gut" the old aluminum can caps?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2014, 11:02 AM
Phil Nelson's Avatar
Phil Nelson Phil Nelson is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,030
The appearance of an old capacitor tells you basically nothing unless it has catastrophically exploded.

Caps may look perfect on the outside and be utterly worthless on the inside. Conversey, as ggregg noted, an old cap can also look awful on the outside -- all grungy, dripping, etc. -- and still be operational.

It's like finding a 60-year old car in the barn and trying to guess the condition of its engine by inspecting its paint job. Not a reliable guide

The failure rate for 60-year old electrolytic and paper capacitors is so high that you will save a lot of time and grief if you simply replace them all.

Phil Nelson
Phil's Old Radios
http://antiqueradio.org/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-26-2014, 11:20 AM
CaryLee's Avatar
CaryLee CaryLee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Nelson View Post
The appearance of an old capacitor tells you basically nothing unless it has catastrophically exploded.

Caps may look perfect on the outside and be utterly worthless on the inside. Conversey, as ggregg noted, an old cap can also look awful on the outside -- all grungy, dripping, etc. -- and still be operational.

It's like finding a 60-year old car in the barn and trying to guess the condition of its engine by inspecting its paint job. Not a reliable guide

The failure rate for 60-year old electrolytic and paper capacitors is so high that you will save a lot of time and grief if you simply replace them all.

Phil Nelson
Phil's Old Radios
http://antiqueradio.org/index.html
Howdy Phil!

So a cap with both ends bulged out can still be, technically, "good"?

Guess I should save those for spares!
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 01-26-2014, 11:46 AM
CaryLee's Avatar
CaryLee CaryLee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 108
Photo of finished recap..except for the one electrolytic next to the transformer center-left, which is the one I came up short on because the SAMS parts list only indicates one 10uf 25 volt cap used. That one will be replaced later today, "Radio Shack be willing and the creeks don't rise". The other one is upper far right, normally covered by a metal box. It's tucked in behind the upper end of the yellow replacement cap up there. I put the one I had up there because it looked tough to get to, and it was, without a doubt, the most frustrating cap to install on the entire set so far.

If some of the electrolytic replacement looks a bit "ham-fisted", well, "c'est la vie", once the chassis is back in the set, I won't be able to see 'em, even from my house!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dumontrecap.jpg (134.2 KB, 45 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-26-2014, 12:04 PM
Kevin Kuehn's Avatar
Kevin Kuehn Kevin Kuehn is offline
Workin' Late Again
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 3,976
Lookin' good. I used to could see up close at a microscopic level back in my 20's, now I need to rely on a couple different strengths of reading glasses that I pick up at the grocery store.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-26-2014, 12:47 PM
CaryLee's Avatar
CaryLee CaryLee is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Kuehn View Post
Lookin' good. I used to could see up close at a microscopic level back in my 20's, now I need to rely on a couple different strengths of reading glasses that I pick up at the grocery store.
Thanks! It's not as tidy as if I'd restuffed the cans and cardboard tubes, but there's a lot of room under that chassis for a lot of stuff.

I've been wearing specs since I was about 10 or earlier, but I used to be able to focus close up still wearing them. Over the last few years, that ability has just about disappeared. I've always been heavily "near sighted". Now, with my glasses on, I can see clearly from about a foot away to out as far out as I want, but things get blurry close up. I take my glasses off, and I can see crystal clear from about two inches out to about 6 inches out. There's an area between the 6 inch and one foot mark where I can't see ANYTHING clearly, with or without glasses, and that's where bifocals would come in.. call it vanity, but I'm resisting "old people glasses" as long as I possibly can!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.