Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Things with Motors

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2014, 11:32 PM
Red Raster's Avatar
Red Raster Red Raster is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Prince George B.C. Canada
Posts: 184
The more I drive it the more I want to keep it, Also I get a kick out of answering questions like Where did you get it? "from the dealer" or what restoration did you do
after getting it? "none I got it new" And most of all it really stands out in the modern croud

Last edited by Red Raster; 07-27-2014 at 11:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2014, 08:52 AM
marty59's Avatar
marty59 marty59 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 915
There's a reason why the Cutlass was such a top seller and a big money maker for Olds. The G-Bodies to me were a disappointment when they first came out in '78 but GM did a good job of refining them through the years. The Grand Prix was ok but the Cutlass/442/Hurst Olds, Buick Regal/Grand National/GNX and the Chevrolet Monte Carlo/SS became standouts worthy to be collectable and the aftermarket support has been growing for these cars.

Gee, we're not helping you very much in deciding to get rid of it, huh?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2014, 12:50 PM
Sandy G's Avatar
Sandy G Sandy G is offline
Spiteful Old Cuss
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rogersville, Tennessee
Posts: 9,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by marty59 View Post
There's a reason why the Cutlass was such a top seller and a big money maker for Olds. The G-Bodies to me were a disappointment when they first came out in '78 but GM did a good job of refining them through the years. The Grand Prix was ok but the Cutlass/442/Hurst Olds, Buick Regal/Grand National/GNX and the Chevrolet Monte Carlo/SS became standouts worthy to be collectable and the aftermarket support has been growing for these cars.

Gee, we're not helping you very much in deciding to get rid of it, huh?
Yeah, they looked IMPOSSIBLY short, stubby & fat, compared to the log, low sleek cars of 1973-'76. Funny how they had seemingly more USABLE room inside. My '76 Cutlass Supreme Brougham was LAUGHABLY small inside, especially in the back seat. You couldn't "Cuss a Cat" back there, it was so small.
__________________
Benevolent Despot
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.