Do "roundie" color sets make a better picture than later sets?

[etype2]

Originally Posted by Electronic M

I just noticed another thing wrong in your comparison the 'roundy' picture is a field sequential set. Field sequential sets are scarce as hens teeth, and are a completely different (and less adjustable) process of color image generation (monochrome CRT with a color wheel spinning in in front of it) than a normal color CRT, and I'd dare say fall outside the most peoples definition of a roundy color set.

I wish I had time to re-read everything, but I don't.

I personally strongly dislike flatscreen sets. Non-Gaussian image elements don't look right to me (a certain softness and cross fade from picture element to picture element makes an image look better), I don't like (makes my eyes tired) the flashing nature of image refresh in a flat screen (versus the soft fade of a CRT), and don't get me started on viewing angle limitations of flat screens and all the maladies digital video has built in to it. If I ever go HD I'm getting an HD CRT set.

You are not telling me anything I don't know. I already said it was a field sequential set and that a better comparison would be to compare a CT-100 or other "modern" roundie from the 60's and sorry, if you don't read through my posts, then I have to respond.

Good luck with your future HD CRT.