![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry to be negative. Dont get me started on DTV .LOL .Because. its a failed format.I said this before that I used too get all channels the analog way and some came in just with the antenna lugs.New I dont receive crap with this crappy new system.VHF or UHF.Its a pile of crap that was unloaded too sell off the TV channel bandwidth to the telecom people and other wireless companies. .Thanks to the MSM for the brainwashing the public saying its better then regular TV.Fake news BS..
End of my rant. Last edited by centralradio; 10-31-2017 at 04:54 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=29 When the going gets tough, the tough get BIGGER ANTENNAS ![]() jr |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by centralradio; 10-31-2017 at 09:33 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's too bad you have such bad results. It's 100% all good here. No airplane fading, no static noise slowly crawling up the picture from noisy power lines and other sources, no ghosting from multipath. Don't miss any of that. With a good antenna and tuner DTV works great. I even pull in a station from Oklahoma with the same picture quality as the locals and the OK station is about 100 miles away, on RF 12, KXII 12. Over 110 channels total. Much more efficient.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks Ed.Wow you are lucky.It is a bad experience and thats why I'm probably so negative over DTV. I see the benefits of it but its useless if I cant get even one channel.I probably have put up a 50 foot mast antenna to get anything here.If it was the other way around .I would cut the cable and go OTA.For $36 bucks on cable and thats all its worth to me. |
| Audiokarma |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|