|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-06-2017, 12:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don’t think so Eric, if there were anything wrong with it then it would have failed ring test or not worked at all. Boost voltage is low as well, there’s not much bootstrapping action going on. That’s what leads me to believe it needs more B+ in the first place, but I know nothing without seeing the spec sheet. I could see this exact thing happening if a fly was fed half the voltage it should have, but again I need proof.
__________________
Evolution... 
|
|
#2
11-07-2017, 01:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe you have the horizontal output tube plate connected to a wrong terminal, in that the output pulses are going thru too much of the flyback coil. That would lead to lower high voltage and lower boost...
 Check with an ohmmeter (with the set off) and see if you find a terminal around half the resistance than that you have the output tube plate connected to. That terminal might be the one to use. If you do change something, test fire up the set and measure the voltages to see if they are closer to correct, and check the cathode current of the output tube (and check that the tube isn't red-plating).
__________________
|
|
#3
11-08-2017, 06:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nick,
Do you happen to have a Ram p/n that you need. My buddy has a lot of Ram fly backs.
|
|
#4
11-09-2017, 07:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
As an FYI, here's what my catalog has.
 
Last edited by Dave Tilotta; 11-09-2017 at 07:57 PM.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
