![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've heard those coils criticized by more than one person, but the people doing the criticism don't site modern off the shelf parts as being part of their better solution...I don't have time to hunt out of production borderline unobtainium, I also don't have the equipment or skills to rewind much less wind new multi-layer coils or properly characterize them or verify performance outside of eyeballing the screen (I also don't have money or time to pick that up)...So until someone comes up with a better list of current production off the shelf parts I can buy off mouser or digikey I'm going to stick with what I know works decently in both of my sets and very soon a set I'm restoring for a customer.
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
in all cases. Only one, the 6.8 mH one in the Q, needed a value much different than the spec. I also found them to be the best ones in my HF radio 7 to 11 pole bandpass filters. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting. Is there any significant difference between the API made ones that makes them better in some circuits or is it the same either way? Do you remember what value or part you used for the 6.8mH Q coil?
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
When wound, I would apply the nail lacquer I bought at Walmart to hold the windings in place. I would then take the coil and measure the inductance using a series resistor, signal generator and oscilloscope to determine the 0.707 point when the inductive reactance equals the resistance. I would tend to be a bit generous with overwinding so that I could remove turns to hit my target inductance. I did this for almost all of the 8 or so open peaking coils in my CT100. The coils in the I and Q chroma path were fairly critical in order to get a nice flat 1MHz response for the I channel and 500kHz for the Q channel. I frequency swept the luminance and chrominance channels and they matched closely the RCA published curves. And the net result was a an extremely nice sharp picture, free from ringing. Looking at my bunch wound coils, it would be difficult to distinguish from a new commercial replacement. And my coils looked a heck of a lot better than the original ugly white blobs. Last edited by Penthode; 01-24-2024 at 12:24 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Winding Coils
I have used the Digi Key replacements for the failed white coils- the only difference is that I put them in Series to add up to the desired value using a L-C-R meter. I believe it is the difference in DC resistance that causes the ringing- not the coil itself. By increasing the DC resistance it minimized the undesirable ringing (you can see it on the scope) to be indistinguishable.
Great job winding your own! Kirk
__________________
[email protected] |
| Audiokarma |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Tom C. Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off! What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|