![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But I went back to my original set-up without the boost, and I started modulating to some UHF channels, and the wireless reception did work better for some of these UHF channels. But still, not the same quality as direct connect. BTW, when I'm doing these testings, the antenna and the wireless sets are in the same room, maybe just a foot away, and I still can't achieve a clear picture like I would with a direct connect. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Aren't we dealing with broadcast frequencies here
__________________
We're all in the same boat. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cable frequencies include broadcast frequencies.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What would be more ideal, putting an amp before the combiner or after? If before, then I would need to find an amp combiner? Is there such a thing? LOL! What are cable system amps? Like any old school blonder tongue amplifier? I searched ebay for Blonder Tongue Amps and most are just one in, one out. Can you tell me which of these search results fits my need? https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...ifier&_sacat=0 |
| Audiokarma |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I just tried placing the boost between the antenna and one of the outputs on the splitter. But doing this, the boost needed to be used backwards by using a f-type coupler. Wireless reception is much better now with some ghost bars, depending on channel, it can go up and down or left and right, but the picture is clear. And this time, the wired tvs are not effected, they are still crystal clear. I'm still going to buy some of those blonder tongue amps, just to see how all this looks with better equipment. Last edited by obsolete man; 10-14-2024 at 05:45 PM. Reason: Incorrect info |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|