![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL!! Doug and I have quite a bit in common but being clean minded is NOT one of them.
I agree about the hair and make-up styles of the '60s, TOO hot! They really get my horizontal output tube all excited! I have Vargas and Playboy pin-ups all over my tv room and I plan to put up more. Personally, I think the women's styles of today are a bit trashy, I too was born in the wrong decade. My advise to all: watch Playboy TV on a Roundie, it looks AWESOME![]()
__________________
My TV page and YouTube channel Kyocera R-661, Yamaha RX-V2200 National Panasonic SA-5800 Sansui 1000a, 1000, SAX-200, 5050, 9090DB, 881, SR-636, SC-3000, AT-20 Pioneer SX-939, ER-420, SM-B201 Motorola SK77W-2Z tube console McIntosh MC2205, C26 |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
What a fantastic thread! Playboy, '60s hotties (now in their sixties), helmet hair (sans pillbox hat), long fake eyelashes, great album cover (hate the song), stars and groups offering free exposure, great flesh tones, and a roundie that has the vertical cranked to give the girls longer looking legs. He probably worked for DOW Chemical. What a great decade. Sex, drugs, and rock-N-Roll forever!
![]()
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
very brief mention of Jim Conway show in 1962:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/...,5493430.story |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
This IS a fun photograph. My take on it:
The shot was made with natural lighting. Look at that as yet (at this writing) unidentified stereo console. Notice that it and that whole back area of the room is NOT in focus; it's because the lens is way open, which of course causes a narrow depth of field because (again) the shot was taken with little and probably no artificial lighting, just what's coming in those huge windows. The operating set and the 'talent' are all that's in focus. Furthermore, that operating set is facing away from the windows so it receives as little of the available light as possible and allows the film to register the video image with acceptable contrast. It all fits: taken not in a showroom, actual TV image on the screen, and an available light photo -- look at all those reflections in the polished cabinet tops -- nobody is going to air brush them in. Eagle-eye (also known as Doug) spotted the open-cabinet, which makes it a prop for sure. This is certainly a stylist's set and not a showroom. I visited the Zenith showroom in Chicago in January 1964 and it looked like a showroom, nothing like this room. What this may well be is an area in a building that was rented or otherwise made available just to take this shot, which will perhaps make it all the more difficult to identify from the window view. In the mid-seventies, GQ magazine did this in NYC to illustrate its hi-fi articles. They made a big production of it, shipping gobs of stereo equipment to an up-scale apartment just for an article illustration.As for the 'hottie' [known as 'talent' today but 'the broad' back then (a term of endearment mostly, not so much the negative connotation it may project today, just listen to Sinatra songs of that time)], check those feminine hands with the manicured nails and pink polish. Today they'd be fake and/or painted black. Pete |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just want to point out that the set is tuned to channel 5, which would have been NBC if in Chicago. Still don't recognize the host (assume it's the guy with arm raised to apparently hold a microphone - hard to see). Wish I could see more of the program's set and could tell what the painting on the floor is. Also, in the realm of useless info, there seems to be the hand of a 7th person at the far left.
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
ya' know the guy in the suit looks a little uncomfortable with Lady in green so close by. which is sad because she appears to be digg'n him. just my 2 cents worth, logan
PS i still think the program is some sort of a fashion show, 3 ladies of different ages but all have the same height, body shape and wearing the same gloves. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pretty sure the console sereo in the background is a Zenith.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I agree. Women back then took pride in their look. They dressed to the nines in those tight form fitting dresses, pearls etc....I wasn't around back then, but some of the most gorgeous women appeared on TV and in movies then. I agree. Zenith would be the BEST buy. I bet the guy wouldn't spring for the space command remote, since he had to save a little to keep up that subscription to Playboy. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
The guy is no slob either.
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
thanks for sharing these files
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
My TV page and YouTube channel Kyocera R-661, Yamaha RX-V2200 National Panasonic SA-5800 Sansui 1000a, 1000, SAX-200, 5050, 9090DB, 881, SR-636, SC-3000, AT-20 Pioneer SX-939, ER-420, SM-B201 Motorola SK77W-2Z tube console McIntosh MC2205, C26 |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which brings on The Eternal Question- Ginger or Mary Ann ? Mary Ann man, myself-Figured Ginger would never give a guy like me who bears a striking resemblance to the North End of a Southbound Jackass the time of day, anyhow...
__________________
Benevolent Despot |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mary Ann for me too, I like the "country bumpkin" type
__________________
My TV page and YouTube channel Kyocera R-661, Yamaha RX-V2200 National Panasonic SA-5800 Sansui 1000a, 1000, SAX-200, 5050, 9090DB, 881, SR-636, SC-3000, AT-20 Pioneer SX-939, ER-420, SM-B201 Motorola SK77W-2Z tube console McIntosh MC2205, C26 |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
So... I have someth'in else in common with you guys.
Everybody expressed my first thoughts of the lady in green very well but I have had the impression that women and everybody had more appropriate, intelligent and all around more cool personalities back then which makes me find those times to be the better sexy than today's ways. I hope to someday see the tapes of Playboy Afterdark that I have seen bits from on Hugh Hefner's biography. Is he the luckiest man ever created or what? I also was born too late
|
| Audiokarma |
![]() |
|
|