Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early B&W and Projection TV

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2022, 09:40 AM
Chris K Chris K is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electronic M View Post
I think that's a typo on the schematic. If the original can is still present on chassis and has a legible label on it I would look for text stating 'can negative' or 'can positive' on the can to confirm.
Schematics have typos and aren't always the same chassis revision, in vintage electronics....An original chassis with original factory parts and wiring is just about always going to be more right than the schematic, so it's wise to recap based on what's actually in the set with the paperwork as an extra guide if you get lost or need a 30k feet view of things.
Thanks Tom...yes I'm beginning to understand the typo issue. I do have the Sams and the Radiomuseum schematics and despite being 2 different versions, they do agree on the chassis grounding of the positive side of the 2 paper/phenolic electrolytic caps. I've attached the Sams here and earlier in the thread I attached the RM version, so if you have some time in the next few days (yeah right Chris...Christmas. Who has time!), can you take a quick look and see if they do agree? As always, thanks for your help!
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Sams Pilot TV-37.pdf (796.5 KB, 12 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2022, 09:51 AM
Electronic M's Avatar
Electronic M Electronic M is offline
M is for Memory
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pewaukee/Delafield Wi
Posts: 15,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris K View Post
Thanks Tom...yes I'm beginning to understand the typo issue. I do have the Sams and the Radiomuseum schematics and despite being 2 different versions, they do agree on the chassis grounding of the positive side of the 2 paper/phenolic electrolytic caps. I've attached the Sams here and earlier in the thread I attached the RM version, so if you have some time in the next few days (yeah right Chris...Christmas. Who has time!), can you take a quick look and see if they do agree? As always, thanks for your help!
If you look at the edit in my previous post I went to the ETF and looked up the schematics quick and it looks like the positive ground on the cans is correct. I'd still read the can labels to confirm things, but the odds of both Riders and Sam's having it wrong are much lower than only one of them getting it wrong.
__________________
Tom C.

Zenith: The quality stays in EVEN after the name falls off!
What I want. --> http://www.videokarma.org/showpost.p...62&postcount=4
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ゥCopyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.