|
|
|
#1
07-05-2012, 01:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Special DuMont 109 maybe available?
A friend has a line on a very nice looking DuMont 109 television in Boston, probably available for the taking.
But do not plug this into the wall - it is a weird DC variant. Apparently North Boston still had a bit of the old DC network in the 1950s, just as New York City still had DC in the 1990s. I have no idea how the power supply is different - probably a vibrator. Anyway, if there is any interest, I can bother my friend a bit more. -- Will 
|
|
#2
07-05-2012, 07:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can't imagine a vibrator being hefty enough to provide the power needed for a 40s TV set, but I can't figure out another way they would do it. Please get more information.
|
|
#4
07-05-2012, 10:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
a supply like a sweep circuit to make B+ would be possible but the current would take quite a output tube to work. Possibly a push pull type supply with some HOT's would work and keep you warm in the winter!
|
|
#5
07-05-2012, 11:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a couple Raytheon sets that were also designed for AC/DC.
The rectifier assembly plugs into an Octal socket on the chassis and can be replaced by whatever it is that makes it work on DC, but these are also series strung with no transformer. I can't imagine a DuMont without that massive Sola Transformer on the chassis?
|
| Audiokarma |
|
#7
07-05-2012, 12:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eric, are you sure these sets were designed for DC? I can't imagine how they would work, since the B+ would only be 120v.
|
|
#8
07-05-2012, 12:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Take a look at Sams 75-1 http://www.earlytelevision.org/image...43-Sams-75.pdf It has the option for DC power with a "Polarizing Relay" (vibrator?) the diagram is on page two. You're right about the B+ I don't see anything higher than 127 volts listed in the voltage chart. It has no Flyback using an RF type supply so maybe that's why. I'm guessing they managed to duck most or all of RCA's Patents with that chassis! Last edited by Eric H; 07-05-2012 at 12:43 PM.
|
|
#9
07-05-2012, 12:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Amazing. Yes, it is a vibrator. Must be a hefty one to power that set - 1.7 amps at 117 vac.
|
|
#11
07-05-2012, 02:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hope we see a schematic also! That Raytheon is TWISTED! Three 50B5 audio outputs in parallel! And yes, a vibrator! Can you imagine having to replace the vibrator! The customer would be boiling oil to throw!
|
|
#12
07-05-2012, 02:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Correction: the 50B5s are horizontal outputs in parallel. It hardly gets more twisted than that.
__________________
tvontheporch.com
|
|
#13
07-05-2012, 04:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I recall marveling at the oddity of the Raytheon design when I scanned that SAMs and submitted to ETF. Three 50B5s in parallel for the hz output, and a 35Z5 for damper!
Looking carefully at the circuit, I believe the "polarizing relay" is NOT a vibrator, but merely a relay which makes the set work regardless of which way you plug it into a DC outlet. Probably a relay with a permanent magnet that is sensitive to polarity of current in its solenoid. Note how the voltage from the output of the polarizing relay bypasses the filter, which would not be done if it were a vibrator. Also note (as mentioned above) that the are no DC voltages over 120 VDC in the voltage chart (except where boosted by the hz output). Last edited by Tom Albrecht; 07-05-2012 at 04:35 PM.
|
|
#14
07-05-2012, 05:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tom, thanks for setting the record straight. Amazing that they could make a set with maximum B+ of 120. I guess there was a market for DC sets, since there were still pockets of DC power in the US in the late 40s.
|
|
#15
07-05-2012, 08:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
| Audiokarma |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
